【作者】 李晓辉；

【导师】 何文燕；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 既判力是表述确定的终局判决实质上确定力、通用力的一个学理概念。既判力主要针对后诉发生作用,而这种作用多以前诉裁判中的认定对后诉产生的约束这种方式表现出来。一方面使判决终局地确定当事人之间的实体法律关系,当事人不得在此后作相异的主张,法院也不得作不同的认定;另一方面对于已被终局判决拘束的诉讼标的,当事人不得再次起诉,法院也不得受理。简而言之,既判力禁止争执,禁止反复。不论是在大陆法系,还是在英美法系,既判力理论都是诉讼立法及理论研究不可或缺的一项内容。而我国对既判力理论,尤其是既判力主观范围的研究由于种种原因并不深入。本文在思考既判力主观范围及其扩张的义涵、依据、类型的基础上,就既判力主观范围扩张与周边理论、制度的整合,以及在我国民事诉讼中具体存在的问题进行讨论。尤其是既判力主观范围的扩张涉及到的如何妥善解决既判力对当事人以外的人拘束力的必要性和正当性之间的矛盾,结合各种情况下所要求的具体条件,对我国的民事诉讼制度、程序进行反思,力求调和这一对价值冲突,寻找到相互协调共存、并充分发挥各自理念力量的平衡点。在此基础上,结合我国现状提出一些建议,如使当事人适格理论与主观扩张相协调、依具体不同情况给予案外人相应的权利保障、适当调整当事人处分权、辩论权等。为一定限度内既判力主观范围扩张提供理论支持、制度支撑。更多还原

【Abstract】 Res judicata is a concept of study that identifies a determine force or general power of making the final decision. Res judicata mainly applies to post-litigation, in the way that the identification of the former referee formed a restraint to the post-litigation. To make a final decision on the one hand, this will be able to determine the legal relationship between the entities, thus the parties shall not make a different proposition and the court shall maintain the same decision; On the other hand, as to those litigation in which a final decision has been made, the parties shall not bring a lawsuit again and the court shall not accept and hear the case either. In short, res judicata prohibits dispute and repetition. The theory of res judicata is an indispensable theoretical research content of legislation and litigation, both in the civil law, or at common law. The study on the theory of res judicata in our country, especially in the subjective scope of res judicata is not thorough because of various reasons. In this paper, Basing on considering the connotative meaning, foundation and types of the subjective scope of res judicata and the expansion, this paper discusses the combination of the subjective scope of res judicata and its expansion with those related theories and principles, as well as some specific problems during civil proceedings in our country. In particular, the expansion of subjective scope of res judicata is related to how to work out the contradiction between the necessity and legitimacy of the restraint the res judicata enforced on people who are not parties. In combining specific requirements needed under different circumstances, this paper also reflect on our country’s civil proceedings and systems, trying to reconcile the conflict of this pair of values, to find the coexistence of mutual coordination, and give full play to their own concept of power balance. On this basis, this paper will make some propositions in line with our country’s status quo, such as to enable coordination between the fitness theory of the parties and the subjective expansion; depending on the specific circumstances, to give the protection of rights of those people who are out of the case and to modulate the disposition and the right of the parties to argue, and so on. Those could to some extent provide the res judicata with a theoretical and system support.更多还原