【作者】 王小荣；

【导师】 郑远民；

【作者基本信息】 湖南师范大学 ， 法律， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 全国人民代表大会常务委员会《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》,已于2005年10月1日正式实施,为我国司法鉴定的发展掀开了崭新的一页。这一决定对目前鉴定机构和鉴定人管理有着重要的规范作用,但对鉴定程序规定较少,较为原则。我国三大诉讼法对鉴定程序的规定也是较为简单、不明确,这使司法鉴定的日常程序性工作缺乏相应的依据。仅有《决定》不可能全面解决当前司法实践中有关鉴定的问题,鉴定制度改革应和诉讼体制改革保持同步,将其与诉讼法的修改和证据规则的制定结合起来通盘考虑。目前三大诉讼法都在进行修改,怎样运用诉讼程序来规范与鉴定有关的活动,保证鉴定结论的可靠性,保障司法的公正性,是一个值得深入研究的问题,也是司法鉴定立法的当务之急。笔者以笔迹鉴定为考察视角通过对外委托笔迹鉴定工作实践中遇到笔迹鉴定程序的启动、样本客观地收集、鉴定机构的选择、鉴定结论的审核认定及冲突结论的采信、是否需要建立笔迹鉴定结论的复核机构等问题,结合当前法律法规中存在的不足与缺陷,对司法鉴定的程序进行深入研究,提出合理法建议,有利于鉴定结论的客观真实,有利于保护当事人的合法权利,使我国混乱的鉴定秩序得到进一步规范。更多还原

【Abstract】 The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress "about Expert evidence Management Question’s Decision",has implemented officially in October 1,2005,has lifted a brand-new page for our country expert evidence’s development. This decision manages to present accrediting body and the expert has the important standard function,but are few to the evaluation program stipulation,principle.Our country three big procedural law to evaluation program’s stipulation are,also simpler,are not explicit,this commissioner the law appraisal’s daily procedural work lacks the corresponding basis.Only has "Decision" is impossible to solve in comprehensively the current judicial practice the related appraisal question,the appraisal system reform should maintain the synchronization with the lawsuit organizational reform,unifies it with the procedural law revision and evidentiary rules’s formulation all-around considered.At present three big procedural law are making the revision,how to come the standard and the appraisal related activity using the legal procedure,guaranteed that the appraisal conclusion the reliability,the safeguard judicature’s fairness,is one is worth the deep research the question,is also the expert evidence legislation urgent matter.The author meets the handwriting evaluation program take the handwriting appraisal as the inspection angle of view through the foreign request handwriting appraisal working practice in the start,the sample to collect,the accrediting body choice,the appraisal conclusion verification to recognize and the conflict conclusion objectively picks the letter,whether needs to establish the handwriting appraisal conclusion to reexamine questions and so on organization,in the union current laws and regulations exists the insufficiency and the flaw,conduct the deep research to expert evidence’s procedure,proposed that reasonable method suggested that is advantageous objectively in the appraisal conclusion real,is advantageous in protects litigant’s lawful right,enables our country chaotic appraisal order to nbtain further standard.更多还原