【作者】 汤丽娜；

【导师】 张成敏；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 诉讼法， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 刑事程序争议存在于刑事诉讼展开的各个环节,是指被追诉人与国家公权力机关就有关程序问题产生的争议。本文认为,程序争议应当纳入法院裁判的范畴,通过法院这一中立裁判机关,以控辩审三方诉讼结构进行解决。本文分三个部分对刑事诉讼程序争议及其法院裁决机制进行论述。第一部分为概念分析,研究重点在刑事程序争议的内容及法院裁决机制中控辩审三方角色的冲突与职能上,通过这一部分的论述明确程序争议的表现形态和法院裁决的方式与结果。第二部分为功能分析,主要研究法院裁决程序争议机制的程序运行,通过揭示法院裁决程序能够产生的好结果效能与保障刑事诉讼程序独立价值的功能,进一步分析其本身能够产生的程序效益。第三部分为运行分析,该部分是本文的重点,主要运用社会科学方法,分析目前我国现行刑事诉讼框架下的审判制度与庭审模式,探讨如何将程序争议纳入我国法院的裁判范围。更多还原

【Abstract】 Criminal procedure disputes exist in all aspects of criminal proceedings. They are mainly over issues related to the procedures of criminal proceedings between the accused and the court. This article argues that criminal procedure disputes should be adjudicated and thus solved by the court which takes neutral ground in the litigation relationship consisting of the prosecution、the accused and the court itself. In this dissertation the criminal procedure disputes and its court adjudication mechanism will be demonstrated in three aspects as follows:Part one is concept analysis of which the emphasis is to study the content of criminal procedure disputes and conflicts among the prosecution、the accused and the court and functions of the three sides. The manifestation of procedure disputes and ways as well as results of court adjudication will be demonstrated in this part.Part two is function analysis of which the emphasis is to study how the court adjudication mechanism of criminal procedure disputes works. By revealing the facts that the mechanism can bear fruit and ensure the independence of criminal procedure, I’ll further analyse the the procedure-related benefits generated by the mechanism.Part three is operation analysis, and it’s the emphasis of this whole dissertation. Using social science methodology, it will analyse China’s current adjudication system and court-adjudication mode in criminal proceedings and how to include criminal procedure disputes in the court adjudication system.更多还原