【作者】 刘芳芳；

【导师】 黄涧秋；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 民事再审制度是一种特殊的纠错和救济程序,在民事诉讼程序中具有重要的地位。我国的民事再审制度规定了人民法院自我监督的同时赋予人民检察院的法律监督权以及当事人享有依法提起再审的权利。十余年的审判实践表明,这一制度存在诸多弊端,尤其是人民法院作为启动民事再审程序的主体越来越受到质疑。民事诉讼程序的内在价值在于程序公正和程序效益,民事诉讼的目的在于当事人的利益得到保障,通过诉讼达到实体正义与程序正义的统一。单纯追求外在的价值,片面追求实体公正,忽略程序上的公正,并不是真正意义上的司法公正。本文将从民事诉讼价值及民事诉讼目的角度入手,阐述人民法院启动民事再审程序的弊端及取消这一启动主体的必要性,同时提出限制人民检察院的法律监督权,以当事人申请再审作为启动民事再审程序的主要渠道这一观点。更多还原

【Abstract】 The civil retrial system is a special procedure of error-correcting and relief .It has an important position in the civil procedure.Our country’s Civil Retrial system provides the people court’s selfsupervision, the people’s procuratorate’s legal supervision and the litigant’s right raising retrial according to law.The recent ten-years’trial practice shows: the system has many defects, especially that the people’s court as the main body of the start-up civil Retrial Procedure,is becoming increasingly questionable.The intrinsic value of the civil procedure lies in procedural justice and procedural benefit. The aim of the civil procedure is to guarantee the litigant’s rights And the substantive justice and the procedural justice can be unified through litigation. Seeking solely the external value, seeking one-sidedly the substantive justice, ignoring the procedural justice are not the genuine judicial justice.This paper,outlines the defects of the people court’s start-up the civil Retrial procedure and the necessity for cancelling the start main body from the value and the aim of civil procedure simultaneously, the viewpoint is put forward that restrict the people’s procuratorate’s legal supervision and Make the litigant’s application for retrial procedure as main channel.更多还原