【作者】 杜义；

【导师】 张利民；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律， 2008， 硕士

【副题名】以礼让原则为视角

【摘要】 国际平行诉讼的弊端十分明显,造成了司法资源的浪费,加重了当事人的负担,助长了当事人“挑选法院”。因为尚未建立解决该问题的国际体制,礼让无疑是国际社会解决该问题的最好方式。礼让原则是解决国际平行诉讼最重要的法律原则之一,该原则不仅要考虑法院地国的利益,还要考虑如何建设解决国际民商事争议的国际制度。礼让原则解决国际平行诉讼主要是通过司法机关的直接和间接的合作与默契来实现的:以不方便法院原则拒绝管辖、以先受理法院原则放弃管辖、以中止诉讼原则暂时停止行使管辖权、根据管辖协议放弃管辖权等。我国目前出于保护自身利益的目的,实际上对国际平行诉讼持放任的态度,但实际意义不大,反而会被认为是司法保守主义。根据礼让原则建设我国的国际平行诉讼制度可以有效解决该问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 International parallel litigations’disadvantages are quite clearly, they waste judicial resources, impose heavy financial burden on the parties, further‘forum shopping’etc. Because of the absence of international institution, comity of nations is the best way to create an efficient settlement.Comity of nations, as a centuries-old principle of conflict laws, is the first and foremost principle to resolve the international parallel litigations. It demands considering the benefits of forum nations and the needs of creating a preferable international system to resolve the issues arising out of international commerce.The main way, in which comity resolves the problem of international parallel litigations, is cooperation between legal systems directly or indirectly by declining jurisdiction, using principles such as forum non convenience, first-file rule, respecting forum selection clause, stay.In fact, in order to protect Chinese benefits, the current policy of China is to let the international parallel litigations alone, but the outcome is unsatisfactory; on the contrary the legal system of China created a backward image. Based on comity of nations, we can create a new international parallel litigations system to change it.更多还原