【作者】 杨钊；

【导师】 汪炜；

【作者基本信息】 武汉理工大学 ， 科学技术哲学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 知识产权权利冲突近年来受到了广泛关注。如何正确认识和妥当解决该类权利冲突,是知识产权理论界和司法实践界共同面临的课题。任何知识产权权利冲突的产生、发展和解决,都有其特定的原因、内在的规律和哲学思想的指导。因此,本文从知识产权基础理论着手,深入挖掘隐藏在知识产权权利冲突背后的本质,提高对该问题的认识,提出解决知识产权权利冲突纠纷的一般原则。全文共分为三章。第一章是知识产权权利冲突问题的提出。本章分成两个部分,第一节立足于法学家们对于权利及其权利冲突的基本观点,纵观权利冲突的基本特点及其本质,为知识产权权利冲突问题的提出奠定理论基础。第二节在第一节的理论基础上分析了什么是知识产权权利冲突。同时对知识产权权利冲突问题的真伪进行了辨析,从司法实践中存在大量的权利冲突纠纷案件的客观事实,我国法律对知识产权的权利限制不完备以及知识产权权利人的认识角度进行分析,提出知识产权权利冲突问题是一个确已存在而且必须研究的问题,澄清了认识上的混乱。并全面论述了知识产权权利冲突的原因。认为知识产权权利冲突的原因本质上是价值与利益的冲突,为进一步研究知识产权权利冲突的问题奠定理论基础。第二章是知识产权权利冲突问题的分析。在这一部分,从对现有知识产权权利的冲突哲学理论的分析出发,意图进一步从理论上分析二者冲突的根源问题。通过对权利冲突问题的一般理论分析,从总体上把握知识产权权利冲突的原因和本质,同时通过对知识产权的基础理论的反思,提出冲突的根源也在于知识产权的传统理念。这些传统的理念来源于知识产权保护的合理性认识,即知识产权制度的基础理论。因此,有必要对知识产权基础理论进行反思,更新知识产权理念。第三章集中论述了知识产权权利冲突的解决问题。在经过本文前两部分提出问题,分析问题之后,试图找出解决知识产权权利冲突的方向。本章共二个部分,第一节是对解决知识产权权利冲突原则的把握。具体为:(1)保护在先权利原则。保护在先权是指在同一客体上存在的多个知识产权发生冲突时,按照权利获取的先后保护在先取得的权利。保护在先权虽是各国普遍承认的解决知识产权权利冲突的一项原则,但其适用不是绝对的,而是相对的。它从程序和实体的角度发挥保障作用,是解决知识产权权利冲突最为基本的原则。(2)利益平衡原则;(3)知识产权保护与经济社会发展状况相联系原则;(4)知识产权制度制定的自主原则。第二节从知识产权内部、外部限制机制入手,论述应当如何从在制度上完善和健全知识产权权利限制制度及有效的反冲突措施。更多还原

【Abstract】 Intellectual property conflicts are new law phenomenon arose in recent years, and still increasing now. How to understand correctly and solve the conflicts properly is the common question in front of intellectual property researchers and the judicial practice field. Special reasons and inner rules are always behind the phenomenon. So the text begins from the reasons of intellectual property conflicts , in order to find out the innate character and improve people’s understanding about the question. By analyzing the conflict cases happened around trademark right, put out some common judicial rules to settle intellectual property conflicts.The whole text is composed of three chapters.Chapter one is on the reasons of intellectual property conflicts. This chapter is divided into two parts, Part one is about the jurists’ ideas about right and right conflicts, concluding the characters and nature and social influence of civil right conflicts. At the same time, the dispute about the truth or false of intellectual property conflicts are challenged here. By showing numerous intellectual property conflict cases in practice and the lack of intellectual property rights restriction by law and the owner’s knowledge on intellectual property rights, the author recognizes that intellectual property conflicts are real necessary to research and solve. This viewpoint questions clears up misunderstanding about the problem. A new and simple concept is given to intellectual property conflicts after comparing different idea sand concerning the demand of judicial practice and theory. In part two, the social background of intellectual property conflicts are deeply analyzed. From knowledge to property is the background of productive force. From special privilege to private right is the background of law. The awareness of intellectual property rights is the background of law culture.Chapter two is the theoretical response to the cause of the conflict between intellectual property rights and human rights. In this part, the thesis mainly makes no analysis and response on the conflict between intellectual property rights and human rights, aiming at understanding the conflict theoretically. Based upon generic theoretical research of the issues of rights conflict, the thesis generally holds the cause and essence of the conflict between intellectual property rights and human rights and raises that the conflict on the one hand reflects the conflict of benefits, that is, the conflict between intellectual property rights holder’s benefits and public benefits. On the other hand, it also reflects the value conflict, that is, the conflict between value of equality and efficiency. Also, through the rethinking of the fundamental theories of IP rights, the thesis put forward that the root of the conflict lies in the traditional concept of intellectual property system. These traditional concepts stem from the recognition of the rationality of intellectual property rights protection, namely the fundamental theories of intellectual system. Therefore, there is an urgent need to fundamental theory of intellectual property system, renew reflect on the concept intellectual property system, and then construct a theoretical frame of the harmonious progress of intellectual property and human rights.Chapter three is the harmonious progress of intellectual property with rights. The thesis advances that in order to assist intellectual property progress harmoniously with human rights, a sequence of principles should be carried out in institution designing: namely legal benefits preferred protection principle, benefits balancing principle, relating intellectual property protection to economic social development principle, and the self-determination principle in legislation. Systematically, part two is on the judicial equity rules of intellectual property conflicts. It is very helpful to solve intellectual property conflicts in practice.更多还原