【作者】 崔庆；

【导师】 董小川；

【作者基本信息】 东北师范大学 ， 教育， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 习和探究学习是现实教学实践中两种最主要的历史学习方式,尤其是探究学习,已作为历史课程改革的突破口而得以倡导。这两种学习方式各有利弊。从实现历史新课程目标来看,接受学习与探究学习的有机结合会起到互补的作用。无论是接受或探究获得的知识或经验,都必须与个体原有的认知结构相联系,否则就是无意义的学习。即是说接受学习与探究学习要成为有意义的学习都必须融入建构的成分。因此,我们提出“历史建构性学习教学研究”这一课题。根据中学历史新课程目标与不同的教学内容的需要,我们以建构主义、探究学习、接受学习等教学理论为指导思想,从教师“教”的角度出发,构建了历史建构性学习教学的两种教学模式:探究——建构性学习教学模式与接受——建构性学习教学模式,并对这两种教学模式提出了相应的教学程序与教学策略。在上述理论构想的基础上,我在工作单位兰西县崇文实验学校进行了4个多月的对比实验研究,实验的结果说明实验班学生的历史学业成绩、探究能力、学习兴趣、学习主体性方面均优于对比班,且存在显著性差异。因而得出了历史建构性学习教学的有效性与高效性。依据不同的教学内容采用接受——建构性学习教学与探究——建构性学习教学模式,能有效促进学生在接受学习中进行有意义的接受学习,在探究——建构性学习中既重探究过程又重知识结论。历史建构性学习教学与传统教学比较,最大的不同在于:强调教师的主导作用(指指导、引导、辅导等)及学生主体作用,学生真正成为知识经验的意义建构者;无论是学生接受还是探究而来的知识与经验都与他们原有的知识体系与认知结构相联系,真正成为自己的知识与经验。本文本着“以人为本”的精神,结合自己多年的教学实践、历史学科的特点以及历史新课程标准的要求,就新课程背景下历史教学问题进行了探究,并运用了一些典型案例、图表来加以说明。针对研究过程的体验,研究者对历史建构性学习教学提出了几点须注意的问题。由于研究者的水平与研究时间的有限,本研究的结论还有待进一步检验,教学模式的程序与策略还有待进一步完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the background of the New Curriculum, teachers mainly focus on how to lead students to construct their learning approaches. Reception learning and inquiry learning are two of the primary learning modes for history;especially the latter is advocated as a breakthrough point for history curriculum reform.These two modes have their own advantages and disadvantages.In order to fulfill the target of history new curriculum,it is necessary to integrate these two learning modes effectively.Knowledge and experience,no matter acquired through reception learning or inquiry learning,must be associated with the quondam cognition framework of the corresponding individuals.Otherwise,the learning will be meaningless. In another word,in order to make a meaningful learning,reception learning and inquiry learning must be integrated with the elements of constructivism.Therefore,we propose the research task about the teaching modes of history constructive learning.Based on the target of middle school’s history new curriculum and the requirements of different teaching contents,guided by the theories of constructivism,inquiry learning,and reception learning,this paper proposes two kinds of teaching modes of history constructive learning,named teaching mode of inquiry-constructive learning and teaching mode of reception-constructive learning from the teachers’teaching perspective. The corresponding teaching procedures and the teaching tactics for these teaching modes are also given.Taken the theoretic designs mentioned above for guidelines,I carried out an experiment at the Chong Wen Middle School of LanXi for 4 months. the result shows that the experimental class precedes the controlled class at every index,including the history grades,inquiry abilities,studying interest,and studying subjective.And there exists remarkable statistical difference.Therefore,we can conclude that the teaching mode of history constructive learning is effective Abstract and with high efficiency.Adopting the teaching mode of inquiry-constructive learning and teaching mode of reception-constructive learning according to the teaching contents can help the reception learning to be meaningful learning,and can help inquiry learning focused on inquiry process and knowledge conclusions together.The primary difference between the teaching mode of history constructive learning and the traditional teaching modes is that the former emphasizes on the teacher’s leading function and the student’s initiative function,and makes the student to be the constructor of their knowledge and experiences.So,the knowledge and experiences,no matter they are acquired through reception or inquiry,are all incorporated to their knowledge systems and cognition frameworks,and become their own knowledge and experiences in reality. By using the human-centered approach and in combination with the author’s teaching practice,the special features of history course and the curriculum standard of new courses,this paper analyses the history teaching under the new curricutism Background provides some viewpoints and understandings with some cases and charts. Based on the experience obtained in this research,the author discusses several concerns for the teaching mode of history constructive learning. As the limited of the research’s ability,and the restricted time for this experiment,the conclusions given in this thesis need more checking and verification.Furthermore,the teaching procedures and teaching tactics given in this thesis need to be enriched.更多还原