【作者】 申明宏；

【导师】 王斌；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 法律规定无论公司是由于何种原因而歇业,都应当进行清算,以了结公司在经营过程中产生的债权债务,避免造成一些遗留问题。但由于行政管理与现实情况的一些脱节,有的则出于公司逃避债务的动机,违反法律规定,公司歇业后不进行清算,这种情况极大地损害了债权人及部分股东的利益,扰乱了正常的市场经济秩序。而我国《公司法》及有关法律法规的规定较为原则,关于公司歇业和清算制度的规定缺乏可操作性,有些规定甚至是相互冲突的。本文在借鉴外国立法经验的基础上,通过分析我国现行公司歇业法律规定的不足,从规范公司歇业的认定,公司歇业后的法律地位、公司歇业后的股东解散公司请求权、公司歇业后股东的责任以及公司歇业与公司清算的衔接等方面,提出了相应的完善建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 The law rules that the corporation must be liquidated after it goes out of business regardless of any reason, to complete the creditor’s rights and debt which were produced in the management process, avoid leaving behind some questions. But because administration apart from realistic situation, or to evade the debt ,some corporations violate the legal rules and don’t liquidate, which harm the benefit of creditors and some Shareholders, and harass the normal market economy order. Now available Corporation Law and some rules regulate excessively generally and handle difficulty in reality, some rules and regulations even conflict indeed. On base of other abroad legislation experience,the author of this article suggest some perfect suggestion on the standard about going out of business、legal status、the request of shareholder dismissing the company、responsibility、and the link between the company going out of business and liquidation.更多还原