【作者】 任巍；

【导师】 海棠；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 民商法， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 见义勇为是指没有法定或约定义务，为避免或减少国家、集体、他人的财产和公民的人身安全利益所受到的不法侵害、自然灾害或意外事故造成的损失，不顾个人安危而积极实施的危难救助行为。当前，我国关于见义勇为的立法相当匮乏，并且多见于地方的立法规定，导致对见义勇为者的救济与保护缺乏统一性与有效性。所以有必要厘清相关的理论问题在法律上对见义勇为重新定位，以便更好的保护见义勇为者的合法权益。本文采用文献研究法、归纳研究法及比较研究法等多种研究方法，从见义勇为行为的法律界定、见义勇为行为进行法律救济的理论基础和现实意义、见义勇为的性质、见义勇为的救济途径和对现有法律的完善与制度建构五个方面对见义勇为的法律救济制度做了深入的探讨。明确了见义勇为行为私法上制止侵害行为和公法上行政协助的双重属性。在分析见义勇为者与侵害人、受益人、受害者、国家之间的法律关系的基础上，主张以向侵害人行使侵权损害赔偿请求权、向受益人行使损害补偿请求权、必要费用偿还请求权，以及向国家行使国家行政补偿请求权为手段，从债法、行政法和社会保障法的角度对见义勇为者提供多元的救济途径，达到对见义勇为者的全方位保护，并在文章的最后对现有法律制度的完善提出了自己的见解，以期建立完整的见义勇为法律救济体系。更多还原

【Abstract】 "Be ready to take up the cudgels for a just cause" is refer to non-legal or non-contractual obligation. In order to avoid or reduce the state, the collective, and the property of others and the safety of the people interests are violated, losses caused by natural disasters or accidents, regardless of individual safety and danger, person take up the positive protective behavior in the crisis. At present, China has scarce legal protection on this behavior. More common it exists in the local legislation. It leads to the facts that relief and protection of the heroic individual are lack of cohesion and effectiveness. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the theoretical issues related to the legal right repositioning so that to better protect the legitimate rights and interests for the brave individual.Based on documentation study, summarized research and comparison study and other research methods, "Brave Act for a Just Cause" are in-depth discussed in following 5 areas: the legal identification, legal relief the theoretical foundation and practical significance for the brave individual, the nature of brave act, the relief and protection channels, issues for improvement and building the existed legal system. The writer clarifies the dual attributes from violations on private law and administrative assistance on public law. In analysis the relations among courageous and violated persons, beneficiaries, the victims, and the legal relationship between states, the writer advocates to exercise the right of request compensation from the violated person, the rights of request compensation for damages and reimbursement from beneficiaries, and the right of request social administration compensation. The essay illustrates multiple relief channels from law of obligation, administrative and social security law to reach the all-round protection to the courageous person. And in the chapter end, the essay advances a new view for the refinement of existed legal system to establish an integrity legal relief system to the courageous persons.更多还原