【作者】 张品仲；

【导师】 王天成；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 马克思主义哲学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 本文试图论述作为思维方式的辩证法。通过比较知性与知性思维、知性思维与辩证思维的不同内涵,分析古代朴素辩证法、近代思辨辩证法和现代实践辩证法的形成发展过程和它们作为思维方式的不同理论内容,指出了马克思主义的实践辩证法是最彻底的辩证法,而马克思的实践辩证法作为思维方式是我们当前最合理的思维方式,揭示出了作为现代思维方式的马克思的实践辩证法的内容的规定性,明确了它无可比拟的实践性、科学性、辩证性、批判性、全面性、开放性和深刻性等特点和优点,并论证了它作为哲学思维方式对人的自我理解的巨大功能。更多还原

【Abstract】 The thinking mode is generally the one of realizing the thinking law, that is, the self-representation of the thinking law. It, internalized in human brains, is a complete cognitive system consisting of language, knowledge, concepts, emotions and thinking tradition, playing the key roles of determining the thinking trend and providing the platform for cognition. The dialectic method, as the thinking mode is of special importance to philosophy can be made because only by the dialectic thinking mode can a true understanding of the philosophical objects be made, especially being able to closely grasp the meaning of human life in it. In addition, the modern form of the dialectic method as the thinking mode can be reached only in the practical dialectic method of Marxism; therefore, in this paper, the three aspects from“intellectuality thinking and dialectic thinking”, from the ancient simple dialectics to the modern practical dialectics and the modern practical dialectics as the advanced form as the thinking mode are dealt with in the attitude of unity of logic and history. Depending on the history and with the philosophical masters’thoughts as argumentations, the dialectics as the thinking modes is studies and the practical dialectics of Marxism is finally dealt with.Thoughts take concepts as the forms, and in this case, the thinking modes mean the combining and operating modes of“conceptual frameworks”used by people to understand and retrospect the world. The conceptual frameworks used by human beings to understand the world can generally be divided into the conceptual framework of common sense, the scientific one and the philosophical one, which are applicable to the objects of common sense, scientific objects and philosophical objects, respectively. Based on that the thinking modes of these conceptual frameworks include the ones applicable to common sense, the scientific ones and the philosophical ones, it is thought that更多还原