【作者】 胡祥勇；

【导师】 王明高； 孙昌军；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 刑法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 本文从巨额财产来源不明罪的缺陷出发，以刑事政策一体化的理念为指导，论述了中国家庭财产申报制度的建立与健全、在刑法中增设拒不申报、不如实申报财产罪取代巨额财产来源不明罪等问题，旨在解决反腐败斗争中的司法实践困难，倡导从源头上治理腐败，为推进中国廉政建设进程、完善反腐败的刑事立法提供理论参考。 巨额财产来源不明罪存在缺陷，它违反了刑法和刑事诉讼法的基本原则，是一个实体与程序上的双重悖论。表现在实体上：巨额财产来源不明罪违背罪刑相适应原则和自首制度；表现在程序上：巨额财产来源不明罪是有罪推定和举证责任倒置，有悖于国际人权公约关于沉默权的规定。 巨额财产来源不明罪无法自善其身，其尴尬源自中国反腐败制度存在缺失，要从根本上解决反腐败斗争中的司法实践困难，有效惩治腐败，就必须加强刑事政策一体化；要使国家工作人员的财产来源由“不明”变“透明”，就必须建立健全中国家庭财产申报制度。笔者赞同增设拒不申报财产罪取代巨额财产来源不明罪的观点。认为巨额财产来源不明罪与家庭财产申报制度并无直接的、内在的、必然的联系。 增设拒不申报、不如实申报财产罪，既是保证家庭财产申报制度顺利实施的需要，亦是实现刑法保护国家利益、社会利益和个人利益的社会保护机能的需要，因而是必要的。增设拒不申报、不如实申报财产罪，能基本消除设立巨额财产来源不明罪的真正原因，能够惩治尚存的巨额财产来源不明现象，没有立法缺陷。因而取代巨额财产来源不明罪是可行的。 本文突破传统的狭窄的刑法学观念，提出了惩治腐败犯罪的刑事政策一体化理念，并探讨了拒不申报、不如实申报财产罪的法条表述、犯罪构成、立法价值等问题，较为完美地兼顾了刑法价值和立法技术，并大大推进了预防腐败犯罪的防线。本文有关家庭财产申报制度的研究在国内较为前沿。因此，本文具有较高的理论和实践价值。更多还原

【Abstract】 The essay discourses upon two issues: Chinese Family Property Declaration System and setting up the Offense of Refusing to Declare and Disguising Property to substitute Offense of Huge Sum of Unknown Property. The essay sets out from the defect of Offense of Huge Sum of Unknown Property and is guided by the Theory of Integration of Criminal Policies. It aims at resolving the judicial problems of anticorruption and calling for combating corruption from the headstream.The Offense of Huge Sum of Unknown Property exists defect, it isn’t consistent with the criminal and procedural basic principle, and in fact it is a paradox in substantial and procedural code. There are two contradictions: A. the offense itself violates the criminal legal principle and cop-out system substantially, B. it violates principles of presumption innocent and onus probandi, and infringe upon the defendant’s right to silence of the International Convention of Human Rights.The contradictions of Huge Sum of Unknown Property Offense come from the defect of Chinese anticorruption system. The way to resolve is to strengthen the Integration of Criminal Policies. If we want to make national public servants’ property transparent we ought to establish and consummate the system. The author suggests that China shall set up Offense of Refusing to Declare Property to substitute Offense of Huge Sum of Unknown Property, and he believes that there is no direct, internal and necessary connection between the Offense of Huge Sum of Unknown Property and Family Property Declaration System.Setting up the Offense of Refusing to Declare and Disguising Property is necessary because it is a demand to guarantee Family Property Declaration System to put smoothly into practice, also is a functional demand in social protection to realizes penal code protection national interest, social benefits with personal benefits. Setting up the Offense of Refusing to Declare and Disguising Property can be basic to dissolve real reason of establishing Offense of Huge Sum of Unknown Property, can settle the existed phenomenon of huge sum of unknown property, and have no lawmaking defect. As a result, substituting Offense of Huge Sum of Unknown Property is viable.The essay breaks through the traditional narrow penal code, and put forward the idea of the Integration of Criminal Polices in punishing the offence of corruption, and discusses the method, crime composing and lawmaking value of the Offense of Refusing to Declare and Disguising Property, looks after both the penal code value andthe lawmaking technique, and pushes defense line of the prevention of corruption crimes forward. The research on Family Property Declaration System of the essay is comparatively advanced in China. So the essay is of comparatively high theoretical and practical value.更多还原