【作者】 马琍；

【导师】 陈永革；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 法律， 2002， 硕士

【摘要】 鉴定结论是我国民事诉讼法中规定的重要证据之一，是法官审理案件的辅助性诉讼工具。但法官对鉴定结论的审查运用的标准或依据仅仅是民事诉讼法或司法解释等简单的授权原则性规定。司法鉴定的无序状态突出。笔者用调查报告形式，分三个部分论述，主要通过对民事诉讼中司法鉴定情况的调查，从法官审查运用鉴定结论现状来分析鉴定结论的特征、作用，法官的满意程度，进而分析最高人民法院颁行的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》和《人民法院司法鉴定工作暂行规定》新规定施行前存在问题和原因、特点，新规定特点、创新性及存在不足方面逐一进行分析，同时借鉴国外的相关规定及有益做法，提出了对鉴定制度进一步完善改革的构想。更多还原

【Abstract】 Conclusion of forensic identification is one kind of the important legal evidence of civil procedure in China and the assistant tool applied by law-officer in lawsuit. However, the criterion or basis which justicer check and apply the conclusion of forensic science is only the law of civil procedure and relational legal notion or interpretation , which prescribe some simple rules of authorization in principle. And it is obvious that the work of forensic identification is in confusion . The paper with three parts is in the form of investigation report. In the paper , the writer firstly analyzes the character and function of the conclusion of forensic identification and the degree of the justicer’s satisfaction with it through investigating the case of forensic science in civil lawsuit, according to the actuality that the justicer check and apply the conclusion of forensic identification. And then the writer seriatim analyzes the practical problems and causes and the character before the two regulations-some regulations about evidence in civil procedure and provisional criterion about the forensic science work of people’s court-which are issued for enforcement by the highest court, and the character and the innovative or lacking sides of the two new regulations. At last, the paper gives the assumption of further reformation about the system forensic identification on the base of using foreign correlative regulations and useful practices for reference.更多还原