【作者】 高子渊；

【导师】 李道军；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 由于我国现行法律框架下农村私有房屋所有权与宅基地使用权在房屋买卖过程中的严重脱节,造成城镇居民购买农村私有房屋纠纷不断,其中尤以房屋买卖合同效力的认定为争议焦点,此焦点一直备受学者和司法实务者的关注,但各家观点莫衷一是,由此产生的同案不同判现象屡见不鲜。本文试图通过对各家观点的重新审思,找出判定城镇居民购买农村私有房屋合同效力的法律基础并尝试从根本上提出解决此类合同效力纠纷的有效途径,以期对司法实践有所裨益。本文由引论、正文三章和结语三部分组成,主要内容如下：第一章阐述了关于城镇居民购买农村私有房屋合同的基本问题,包括合同标的、合同主体及合同性质。通过分析买卖现状、立法现状及司法现状中存在的问题,找出城镇居民购买农村私有房屋纠纷的争议焦点,即房屋买卖合同的效力认定问题。第二章在阐述、评析理论界和实务界对城镇居民购买农村私有房屋合同效力的不同观点的基础上,结合合同法关于合同效力有效要件的要求,物权法中宅基地使用权的立法意图、与宅基地分配权的区别、物权区分原则、房地一体处分原则,及法理学中关于理性人、私权利和正义的理论思考,分析认定此类合同有效的法律基础及其所具有的理论和现实意义。第三章首先在立法层面分析了产生城镇居民购买农村私有房屋合同效力争议的根源,即农村私有房屋所有权与其依附的宅基地使用权的严重脱节,并提出了解决这一题根源问题的方案：开禁宅基地使用权的流转。然后又分别从行政层面、司法层面,为政策制定者、行政机关及其工作人员、司法机关及其工作人员提供了完善制度政策、合理行政、理性司法的有益建议。综上所述,论文先是在现有的法律框架下,在合法、合情的基础上寻求最佳的合同效力认定标准,以达到定纷止争、稳定社会的效果,然后再根据当前社会发展的需要,完善相关法律制度,并辅之以行政和司法手段,为从根本上解决合同效力纠纷提供法律支持和理论依据。更多还原

【Abstract】 Under the current legal framework in china, the ownership of private houses in rural areas and the homestead use right are out of touch in the process of buying and selling homes therefore, disputes arising from the sale of private houses in rural areas bought by urban residents are continuing especially, how to identify the validity of contract of housing sales is the focus of controversy, the focus has been concerned by scholars and practitioners, but different schools have different points of view, so the same kind of cases has different judgments, this phenomenon is widespread. This article attempts to re-examine the various points of view, find out the legal basis of identifying the validity of contract about housing sales and propose that how to resolve this dispute of the validity of contract about housing sales in an effective way, the author hopes the article can be benefit for judicial practice.The article consists of three parts:introduction, text and conclusion. The main contents are as follows:The first chapter summarizes the basic issues about the contract concerning private house in rural areas bought by urban residents. This chapter includes contract object, contract subjects and contract character. This part focuses on the analysis of transaction status, legislative status and judicial present situation. On this basis, the article points out the focus of dispute about private house in rural areas bought by urban residents——how to identify the validity of contract about private rural housing bought by urban residents.The second chapter analyzes the legal basis, theoretical and realistic significance of approving validity of contract by elaborating and evaluating various views about the validity of private rural house sales contract in academic and judicial practice areas, and combing Contract Law’s requirements about contract’s valid factors; the legislative intention about the homestead use right, the difference between the use right and participation right of the rural homestead, the discrimination principle of property, the principle of integration of land and house in Property Law; theoretical thinking about reasonable person, private right and justice in legal philosophy area.The third chapter, at the first brush, analyzes the root of the dispute about the validity of contract concerning private rural housing bought by urban residents at the legislative level——the ownership of private houses in rural areas and the use right of the rural homestead are out of touch in the process of buying and selling homes, and proposing the solution about the root of the problem:Lift a ban on the transfer regime of the homestead use right. Afterwards, proposing some beneficial suggestions about improving policies and systems, lawfully executing, rational justice for policy makers, administrative authorities and their staff, judicial authorities and their staff from the view of administration and justice.In conclusion, when legal system and social development are out of touch, first of all, we should seek the best solution legally and reasonably under the current legal framework to settle disputes and stable society; secondly, we should improve the relevant legal system supplemented by administrative and judicial means to meet the needs of social development, and give legal support and theoretical basis with the purpose of disputing the validity of contract fundamentally.更多还原