【作者】 邹文静；

【导师】 李洪欣；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 私放在押人员罪是一种严重的渎职犯罪行为。为了能全面、正确掌握私放在押人员罪的精神实质，并运用法律武器有效地打击私放在押人员犯罪，本文通过将理论与案例相结合的方法进行论证，较为全面、系统地阐述私放在押人员罪的犯罪构成特征，并在总结实践经验，借鉴域外立法与司法的基础上，对私放在押人员罪的不足之处进行了剖析，进而提出相应的完善建议，以期准确定位私放在押人员罪，保证国家司法监管制度的廉洁性与严肃性，为私放在押人员行为编织一张更为严密的刑事法网，切实做到“法网恢恢，疏而不漏”。本文在讨论了私放在押人员罪中具有争议的“司法工作人员”范围，“私放”行为的界定和“在押人员”范围后，认为私放在押人员罪是指依法具有监管职责的司法工作人员私放在押的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人、罪犯或其他依法被拘禁的人员的行为。同时在立法完善上建议增加“剥夺公职权”的资格刑和财产刑并适度调整其法定刑期，故对触犯私放在押人员罪的，处三年以上五年以下有期徒刑，并处或单处罚金；情节轻微的，单处罚金或剥夺公职权；情节严重的，处五年以上七年以下有期徒刑，并处罚金或剥夺公职权；情节特别严重的，处七年以上十年以下有期徒刑，并处剥夺公职权。更多还原

【Abstract】 The crime of unauthorized releasing the person held in custody is a serious crime ofmalfeasance. In order to correctly and comprehensive master the mental essence of thecrime, and the using legal weapons to fight effectively the crime, this article by thecombination of theory and case method of argumentation. Relatively comprehensive,systematic exposition of this crime constitution characteristic, and lays the foundation ofsumming up our practical experience, and referencing the other regions and the foreignlegislation and judicial experience, on the deficiencies were analyzed, and then put forwardthe corresponding improvement suggestions, in order to accurately locate the crime ofunauthorized releasing the person held in custody, guarantee the national judicialsupervision system of honest and seriousness, for releasing prison inmates behavior toweave a more strict criminal law, cogent accomplish "dragnet, be loose but never miss".This paper discusses these controversial issues: the range of “judicial officers”,thebehavior’s definition of “privately discharge”, the range of “prison inmates”. I think thecrime of unauthorized releasing the person held in custody is to point to have theresponsibility of supervision in accordance with the judicial officers privately discharge thecriminal suspect in custody,the defendant, criminal detention or other prison inmates inaccordance with the act. At the same time in the legislation perfect on suggested addingqualifications punishment of "deprived of public authority" and property punishment andadjustments its legal sentence, subject to break prisoners sin privately discharge, be in threeyears of above five years imprisonment and impose or shall only, be fined; If thecircumstances are minor, shall only, be fined or deprived of public authority; If thecircumstances are serious, the place five years shall be sentenced to fixed-termimprisonment of not more than seven years and shall also be fined or deprived of public authority; If the circumstances are especially serious, seven years in more than10yearsimprisonment, and be deprived of public authority.更多还原