【作者】 宋继鸿；

【导师】 路军；

【作者基本信息】 辽宁大学 ， 法律， 2011， 硕士

【副题名】以“杭州飙车案”判决为切入点

【摘要】 随着我国道路交通运输业的迅速发展,汽车等交通工具的数量急剧增长,但同时交通肇事案件发案率也迅速攀升,总体呈上升趋势。自首作为我国刑法确立的一项重要刑罚制度,是具有其独特的积极意义的。但是实践中,交通肇事罪基本犯是否适用自首一直存在较大的理论争议,司法机关对交通肇事案件的犯罪嫌疑人自首情节的认定,存在着认识不统一,导致在交通肇事案件办理上存在差异。所以,对交通肇事罪相关问题的准确理解与把握,自然是非常有必要的。本文拟针对交通肇事罪自首的适用问题,采取实证分析、比较分析、文献研究等方式进行研究,得出本文的研究结论和新的见解:1.交通肇事罪基本犯是适用自首制度的,特别是报警等候行为符合自首条件的应当认定为自首。2.交通肇事罪自首在量刑上的适用,采取“一般情形下从宽处罚,特殊情形可不从宽”的处理建议,并且举例阐明了“特殊情形”的涵义。在整体结构上,第一部分通过对“杭州飙车案”的案情和判决的阐述,提出论文重点讨论的两个问题:一是交通肇事罪基本犯是否适用自首,特别是交通肇事后履行《道路交通安全法》第70条规定的义务是否可以认定为自首。二是针对交通肇事罪基本犯适用自首后如何在量刑上进行考量。第二部分就是对以上两个问题的分析,首先从理论上质疑交通肇事罪不适用自首的学说,推导出交通肇事罪适用自首的合理性,其次就交通肇事罪自首在量刑上讨论能否不从宽处罚,主要是从自首从轻处罚的法律依据、自首从轻处罚原则、影响自首量刑的因素三方面进行研究。第三部分对问题的解决:一是对“杭州飙车案”判决进行法理评析,质疑此案判决不予认定自首是缺乏合理性的,以及对此案的量刑是否合理进行评析,着重讨论被告人事后积极进行赔偿能否从轻处罚;二是重点对交通肇事罪的自首进行立法和司法上的构建,为交通肇事案件自首后的量刑提供少许建议,期望有助于解决理论和实际应用问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 As China’s rapid development of road transport, automobile transport increased dramatically, Traffic Accident incidence rate but also rapidly rising, the overall upward trend. Surrender as an important set of criminal law penal system, is a unique positive. However, in practice, the Crime of the applicability of the basic offense has surrendered the theory there is a big controversy, Traffic Accident judiciary criminal suspects voluntarily surrendered themselves to the identification, understanding there is not uniform, resulting in Traffic Accident on handling differences. Therefore, issues related to the Crime accurate understanding and grasp of nature is very necessary.This paper intends to surrender for the Crime of the application, take empirical analysis, comparative analysis, to study literature, etc., come to the conclusions of this study and new insights: 1 guilty of the Crime of the basic system is applicable to surrender, in particular, act in line waiting for an alarm condition shall be deemed as surrendered surrendered. 2 surrender the Crime of the application in sentencing, to take "normal circumstances lenient punishment, special circumstances may leniency" of the treatment recommendations, and examples to clarify the "special circumstances" meaning. In the overall structure, the first part through the "Hangzhou drag racing case" set out the facts and judgments made paper focuses on two issues,:One is guilty of the Crime of the basic applicability of surrender, especially after the traffic accident to perform "Road Traffic Safety Law" obligations under Article 70 can be identified as surrender. The second is basic for traffic offenses committed after the surrender to apply for consideration in sentencing. The second part is the analysis of the above two questions, First, from the theoretical question of the Crime surrendered the doctrine does not apply to derive the Crime of reasonableness applicable to surrender, Second, the surrender of the Crime of the discussion on whether the lenient sentencing penalties, mainly from the legal basis for extenuating surrender, surrender the principle of light punishment, sentencing factors affecting surrendered three studies. The third part of the solution to the problem: First, "Hangzhou drag racing case" assessment of legal judgments, decisions are not identified questioned turned himself in this case is the lack of rationality, and the case is reasonable for the sentencing assessment, focusing on whether the defendant a lighter after active compensation penalties; Second, focus on the Crime of surrender to build on the legislative and judicial, for the Traffic Accident surrendered to provide a few suggestions after the sentencing, expected to help solve the problem of theory and practical application.更多还原