中国案例指导制度模式之构想

【作者】 李丹华；

【导师】 杨昌宇；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 法律， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 由于成文法本身固有缺陷的存在,加之我国疆域辽阔、民族众多、城乡地域差别大,经济社会发展不平衡,致使法律盲点和弹性都大量存在,法官自由裁量权的空间较大,不同地区、同一地区不同法院“同案不同判”的问题较为普遍,社会对此反响强烈,有损司法公信和权威。在此社会现实情况下,借鉴历史传统和别国经验,借助于案例指导制度,尽可能地统一司法标准、压缩自由裁量权的空间、弥补成文法的不足,已经成为一种现实的选择。本文通过对我国案例指导制度与英美普通法系判例、我国一些地区实行的先例判决的对比分析,揭示了我国案例指导制度的内涵并进行了理性定位;在对我国案例公布方式进行列举诠释的基础上,剖析了存在的问题,并从我国历史传统、立法现状、司法实践等方面论述了建立案例指导制度的现实必要性和实际可能性,最后提出了我国构建案例指导制度的基本构想,以促进案例指导制度在我国的建立发展,促进法律制度的完善和司法的统一。更多还原

【Abstract】 Because of the intrinsic defects of statute laws, the wide range of our country, the numerous ehtnic groups, the big differences between urban and rural areas,the unbalance of economy, the laws have a lot of leaks and the flexibilities.The judge’s discretion is big,and there is a lot of cases happened which are the same facts but different decisions in courts of same area or different areas, so the public have serious repercussions,and affect the public confidence of jurisdiction and judicial authority. In this situation, it is a practicable choice to learn from history tradiong and other countries and by means of case guiding system,unify the judicial standards, control the judge’s discretion ,and make up for statutes.This article compares the Chinese case guiding system and precedents of Common law,then reveal the connotation of Chinese case guiding system and make a rational orientation.Based on the citing of Chinese case publication,this article analyzes the defects of the system,and discusses the demands of reality and practice with consideration of our histrical tradition and legislation and judicial practice.At last this article puts out the basic proposition of Chinese case guiding system in order to promote the development of the system and the perfection of legal system and the unity of jurisdiction.更多还原