论教唆犯的处罚根据

【作者】 张晏玮；

【导师】 陈建旭；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 刑法学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 对于教唆犯究竟为何应受处罚,在学界素有争论,通过对教唆犯处罚根据论的各学说进行比较研究,探寻各种处罚教唆犯理论的差异,可以看到折中惹起说既关注教唆犯自身固有之不法,又兼顾教唆行为必须通过被教唆人来实施犯罪行为,才能形成对法益的现实侵害或威胁,所以在教唆犯处罚根据的各种学说之中,折中惹起说更为妥当。而且根据折中惹起说解释我国刑法对于教唆犯的处罚规定,也更符合我国刑法之立法目的。此外,明确教唆犯的处罚根据,对教唆犯性质研究具有积极意义,因为以往学说理论上对教唆犯成立犯罪时的独立性、从属性或者二重性的探讨,大多没有从教唆犯处罚根据理论出发,所以会得出教唆犯应具独立性或二重性等不合理之结论。结合教唆犯之处罚根据,反思我国现行刑法对教唆犯处罚规定的应有解释方式,澄清教唆犯的处罚范围,并进一步检讨我国刑法第29条第2款的不合理之处,进而提出建议对其进行修改与完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 There has been controversial in criminal law theory circle about why the abettor should be punished. By researching on the theories of punishment foundation of the abettor and the differences between various theories, it’s clearly that the compromised causing theory is more appropriate and more in line with the provisions of the criminal law in China, because this theory not only focuses on the abettor’s own inherent lawlessness, but also doesn’t neglect that the instigates behavior could aggrieve or threaten the law benefit realistically only by the instigated person’s criminal act, and it’s more suitable to the the purpose of our country criminal law legislation. Making sure the theory of punishment foundation of the abettor, there is positive significance to the researching on the nature of the abettor. The conclusion that the abettor’s character is unattached to the actors or the abettor has the two-fold characters ,always comes from that most of the theories previous about the nature of the abettor are not based on the theory of punishment foundation of the abettor. By studying the theory of punishment foundation of the abettor, there is clearly that Chinese criminal law in paragraph 2 of article 29 has its shortcomings, so it is necessary to make the details revised and perfected.更多还原