【作者】 苏友涛；

【导师】 张忠义；

【作者基本信息】 燕山大学 ， 逻辑学， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 公元5世纪末,印度各派哲学思想盛行,其中不乏一些外道理论,使佛教学说的正统地位受到威胁。为破斥外道,弘扬佛法,陈那论师在其代表作《正理门论》一书中对古因明理论进行改革,提出九句因、因三相、三支论式等学说,并对古因明的过失论进行梳理,使佛教因明学说形成一套完整的理论体系。印度逻辑学家将陈那以前的因明学说称为古因明,而将陈那所创建的因明学说称为新因明。可见,《正理门论》在印度因明发展史上是具有里程碑意义的著作。学术界把《正理门论》分为两大部分:能立和似能立、能破和似能破。其中,能立是指正确的宗、因、喻三支;似能立是指有过失的、不能成立的宗、因、喻三支,即似宗、似因和似喻。能破是正确的反驳,在《正理门论》中是指建立一套符合因三相规则的三支论式;似能破是指违反因三相规则,在破斥对方观点中所犯下的各种过失。本文一改以往学术界对《正理门论》的分类方法,将全书分为三个部分:第一部分从梳理同品和异品的概念入手,详细介绍了九句因学说和因三相学说,并运用欧拉图和数理逻辑的方法分析九句因之间的对当关系、因三相之间的推导关系及九句因与因三相的关系。九句因和因三相学说构成了陈那新因明学说的理论基础,是建立三支论式的依据,也是划分过失论的标准,在整部论著中具有奠基石的作用。第二部分在总结古因明论式利弊的基础上对三支论式学说进行阐述,着重强调喻支的变化在从归纳到演绎转变中的重要作用,并对学术界对三支论式逻辑性质的争议提出自己的一些看法。第三部分是总结违背由九句因发展而来的因三相规则所犯的各种错误,即过失论学说。包括宗过5种、因过14种、喻过10种。本文沿用了陈那对各种似能立的分类,并用形象的事例对各种过失进行解释。该分类方法将《正理门论》的几种学说看成是理论基础和正反两种上层建筑的制约关系,这对于正确认识陈那因明体系具有一定的意义和价值。更多还原

【Abstract】 At the end of the 5th century A.D,there were kinds of philosophic thinkings were populared in India,but also many mal theories, even made a enormous threaten to the Buddhist’legitimacy status. In order to denounce heterodoxy’s theories and consolidate Buddhist’legitimacy statu, DIGNāGA innovated the fomer Hetuvidyātheories in his representative work《NYāYA DVāRAāSTRA》,advanced some new theories such as the Nine-Hetu、Trirūpya、the three part inference model, and sort out the fomer Hetuvidyātheories.Made the Buddhist’Hetuvidyātheories to be a complete system. Logicians named Hetuvidyātheories before DIGNāGA as old Hetuvidyā, and after DIGNāGA as new Hetuvidyā. It is observed that《NYāYA DVāRAāSTRA》have a a milestone mean in indian logic’history.Academicians divide《NYāYA DVāRAāSTRA》into two parts: can stand and can not stand; can refute and can not refute. The“can stand”is the correct topic、reason and comparison.The“can not stand”is the wrong topic、wrong reason and wrong comparison.The“can refute”is a correct refute,in《NYāYA DVāRAāSTRA》it means that establish a suit of three part inference model which accord with the regulations of three characteristics of the middle terms. The“can not refute”is a mistake which is contrary to the regulations of three characteristics of the middle terms.This thesis is different with the fomer classification method made by most Academicians, divide this treatise into three parts:The first part begin by regulating conceptions of“same type”and“different type”,make a detailed introduce about the Nine-Hetu and Trirūpya, make euler diagram and mathematical logic methods to analyse relations among the Nine-Hetu.The Nine-Hetu and Trirūpya constitute the DIGNāGA new Hetuvidyā’theory base.It is the basis for the three part inference model, and is also the standard to divide the fault theories.It has a cornerstone’function.The second part explains the three part inference model which is based on summing up the old Hetuvidyā’advantages and disadvantages. Emphasizes the action of the figure part’s change from inductive inference to the deductive inference.And put forward some individual opinions for academicians’disputes about the nature of the three part inference model.The third part sums up all kinds of mistakes which are contrary to Trirūpya.It consists of 7 kinds of wrong topic’mistake、14 kinds of wrong reason’mistake and 10 kinds of wrong comparison’mistake. This thesis continues to use DIGNāGA’s classification about“can not stand”,and use vivid documentation to explain all kinds of mistakes.This classification method take the several theories in《NYāYA DVāRAāSTRA》as arestrict relation between the theoretical basis and the superstructure.It is meaningful and valuable for recognizing DIGNāGA’s Hetuvidyāsystem.更多还原