【作者】 王红；

【导师】 秦长江；

【作者基本信息】 河南科技大学 ， 图书馆学， 2009， 硕士

【副题名】基于共现分析法的信息可视化实证研究

【摘要】 1998年以来,随着全球化、信息化时代的到来,我国图书情报学科经历了巨大变化。面对学科的巨大变革,我国图书情报学界同仁迫切希望系统、全面、直观地了解十年来我国图书情报学科的发展状况,如:它的热点研究领域有哪些?它的学科结构又如何?学科发展的脉络趋势是什么?网络的普及和电子资源的广泛使用给这两个学科带来了什么影响?而将各种信息载体中的共现信息定量化的共现分析法,它不仅继承了定性与定量分析的优势,而且还克服了定性分析主观因素较强且不易操作的弊端,可更深刻、精确地挖掘隐含的或潜在的有用的文本知识,发现研究对象之间的亲疏关系,揭示研究对象所代表的学科结构或主题研究热点的变化。在计算机技术的辅助下,共现分析以其方法的简明性和分析结果的可靠性,成为支撑信息内容分析研究过程的重要手段和工具,其主要表现形式是共词分析与共引分析。鉴于此,本论文尝试采用共现分析法中的共词分析和作者共引分析法相结合对1998~2007年间我国图书情报学科的热点研究领域进行揭示与把握。本论文共分为以下五个部分:第一部分,论述了本研究的实用价值和理论意义,并对本论文的主要研究方法和内容进行归纳与总结。第二部分,阐述了共现分析法的理论基础、类型及流程,总结了共现分析法的国内外研究进展情况。第三部分,采用共现分析法中的共词分析法对1998~2007年间我国图书情报学科的研究热点进行微观层面上的实证分析。以五年为一个时间段,对十年间我国图书情报学科八种核心期刊的高频关键词分别进行聚类分析、类团关系分析和战略坐标分析,从微观上对我国图书情报学科不同时期的研究热点和主要研究领域进行揭示。得出十年来我国图书情报学科的热点研究领域不仅稳中有变,而且还显现出新的时代特征,可见我国图书情报学科的研究范围和内容具有一定的传承性、连续性、稳定性、发展性、阶段性、变化性的特点。第四部分,采用共现分析法中的作者共被引分析法对1998～2007年间我国图书情报学科八种核心期刊的高被引作者进行聚类分析、多维尺度分析和社会网络分析的实证研究,从宏观上对我国图书情报学科的研究热点和学科结构进行分析。得出十年来我国图书情报学科的热点研究领域虽然已经形成,但是学科研究力量不均衡,有待进一步细化,同时也有新的研究领域浮出水面,成果喜人。第五部分,采用对比分析法和演绎归纳推理法较为全面、直观、生动、形象地展示1998～2007年间我国图书情报学科研究热点的发展态势,并总结了本研究的创新点和不足之处。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the globalization and information time coming,Chinese Library and Information Science(abbreviation LIS)has undergone great changes since 1998. Facing the enormous changes in development of discipline, Chinese academics in LIS are eager to learn systematically, comprehensively, intuitively the development of it in the past decade, such as: what its hotspots are; how its subject structure is; what the trends are; what have effect on Chinese LIS as the popularization of the Internet and electronic resources widely used. And co-occurrence analysis, which quantifies the co-occurrence information of all kinds of information carrier, not only inherits the advantages of qualitative and quantitative analysis, but also overcomes the drawbacks of subjective factors of qualitative analysis. So co-occurrence analysis can excavate profoundly and accurately connotative or potential useful text knowledge; it can dig out the affinity-disaffinity relationship of subject investigated; it can also reveal the structure and changes of subject investigated represented subject or topic. Co-occurrence analysis depending on computer technology becomes important means and tools to support information content analysis for simplicity of its methods and reliability of its results, and its main types are co-word analysis and co-citation analysis. In view of this, this paper tries to use co-word analysis and Author Co-citation Analysis to reveal the main hotspots of Chinese LIS from 1998 to 2007.This paper is divided into the following five sections:The first part discusses the practical value and theoretical significance of the thesis, and summarizes the main research methods and contents.The second part explains the theoretical basis、the type and process of co-occurrence analysis,and introduces the development of co-occurrence analysis at home and abroad. The third part mainly uses the co-word analysis method of co-occurrence analysis to make microscopically empirical analysis on research highlight of Chinese LIS between 1998 and 2007. Five years as a period, it performs cluster analysis, cluster relationship analysis and strategical diagram analysis to the high-frequency keywords of eight core journals of Chinese LIS, and reveals microscopically the research hotspots of Chinese LIS in different period. To sum up, the research hotspots of Chinese LIS is not only a stability there been a change over the past decade, but also is endowed with new features of the times. So the research scope and content of Chinese LIS has a certain characteristics of inheritance, continuity, stability, expansibility, variability.The fourth part mainly uses the author co-citation analysis method of co-occurrence analysis to make empirical analysis by cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling analysis and social network analysis on highly cited authors of eight core journals of Chinese LIS between 1998 and 2007, in order that grasp the structure and research focus of Chinese LIS from a macro point of view. Therefore, it concludes that the hot research realm of Chinese LIS has formed,but the research power is imbalance in hope of further refinement, At the same time, the discipline has have new research fields emerging and achieved gratifying results for the last decade.The last one mainly uses the comparative analysis method, deductive method and inductive method to comprehensively, intuitively and vividly display the trend of Chinese LIS between 1998 and 2007. Meanwhile, the paper also points out the innovations and shortcomings in this research.更多还原