节点文献
美学视野下福柯的权力观
【作者】 谭庆柱；
【导师】 郭平；
【作者基本信息】 南京师范大学 ， 文艺学， 2011， 硕士
【摘要】 本文旨在从美学的角度研究福柯的权力观。本文认为：第一,福柯的权力观包含着美学的意义,主体在权力之网中,一方面权力与主体形成宰制关系,身体被规训,情欲被控制,思想被禁锢,另一方面主体与权力形成抵制关系,主体可以通过“关怀自身”实现审美的生存,实现真正的自由；第二,福柯后期的美学思想是与前期的权力观紧密结合在一起的,福柯正是在寻找“反抗权力的可能性”的基础上,最后转向古希腊人的生存美学,美学的救赎既是福柯反抗权力的尝试,同时也表明福柯权力观涵盖着美学解读的可能性。本文将福柯的权力观放在西方哲学的背景中进行考察,福柯的微观权力与传统的宏观权力在运作模式、存在状态和研究视角上有着鲜明的区别,福柯分析权力观的贡献在于将权力的分析从政治领域扩展到整个社会关系网络,分析了权力同政治领域之外的话语、知识、身体和情感的复杂关系。这就为从美学角度研究福柯的权力观提供了可能。福柯强调权力不是一样东西,而是一种关系,是各种势力关系的复合体,是这些势力关系通过持续不断的相互抗争,改变、增强或颠覆它们的过程。这种权力关系是无中心、流动的、可以抵制的自下而上的运作。权力无处不在,任何人都不可能置身于权力之网以外。人在权力之网中,一方面受到权力的统治,权力对人的肉体、情感、行为、思想进行压制,另一方面权力催生反抗,个体通过“自身的技术”实现审美的生存,达到精神的愉悦。从这个意义上说,福柯的权力观是一种走向自由的美学实践,但在现实层面,这种反抗权力的方式,很难实现,福柯的审美的生存只是美学的乌托邦。
【Abstract】 This paper studies Foucault’s concept of power from an aesthetic point.Firstly, Foucault’s view of power contains aesthetic significance. On one hand,there is a conformity between power and subject,in this ralationship,humanbody is disciplined, appetite is controlled,thought is imprisoned;on the other hand,subject and power form a rejection,and subject can achieve aesthetic existence and real freedom by the way "Care of the self’.Secondly,the later asthetic thoery integrate with its early thoery coformly, Foucault is looking for "the possibility of resistance to power",thus, Finally, he turns to the survival aesthetics of the ancient Greeks.We put Foucault’s concept of power on the Western philosophy background, there is a distinct difference between Foucault’s micro-power and power in the traditional mode of operation of the macro, the contribution of Foucault’s concept of power analysis. Analysis of power from the political sphere expanded to the whole social network analysis outside the complexity relationships of power with the political discourse, knowledge, body and emotional. This is from an aesthetic possible of view of Foucault’s concept of power. Foucault stressed that power is not only a single thing, but a relationship between a variety of complex forces. This power relationship is no center,flow, and can resist the bottom-up operation. Power is everywhere, no one can stay outside power-net. In this power network, on the one hand by the rule of power, the power of people’s physical, emotional, behavioral, thought to suppress the other hand, against the powers of birth of the individual through "their technology " to achieve the survival of the aesthetic, to the spirit of pleasure. In this sense, Foucault’s concept of power is a kind of aesthetic practice to freedom, but in realistic level,this mode of resistance is difficult to achieve. But just an aesthetic utopia.