【作者】 卢秀艳；

【导师】 葛宝和；

【作者基本信息】 山东中医药大学 ， 针灸推拿学， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 目的：观察采用腧穴热敏化艾灸法对支气管哮喘慢性持续期症状的改善,与舒利迭药物治疗相比是否更有优越性,从而为针灸治疗该病提供一种新的治疗方法,为进一步深入研究灸法及哮喘的治疗方法提供参考依据。方法：使用“药物临床试验中央随机分配交互式语音操作系统V1.00(中央随机分配系统)”通过网络将42例患者分为治疗组和对照组,每组各21例病人。观察组采取腧穴热敏化艾灸法,对照组采用英国葛兰素史克公司生产的舒利迭。两组均治疗3个月,随访6个月,分别于治疗前、治疗3个月结束时、治疗结束后6个月时,采用中华医学会呼吸病学会哮喘组2003年制定的《支气管哮喘防治指南》中的哮喘症状评分标准即哮喘控制测试表(Asthma Control Test, ACT)测试患者症状的改善程度。结果：1.腧穴热敏化艾灸组治疗3个月结束时、治疗结束后6个月时分别与治疗前比较均有显著性差异,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)；2.舒利迭药物组治疗3个月结束时、治疗结束后6个月时分别与治疗前比较均有显著性差异,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)；3.腧穴热敏化艾灸组与舒利跌药物组治疗3个月结束时、治疗结束后6个月时分别比较均有显著性差异,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：观察组和对照组均能改善支气管哮喘慢性持续期症状,但观察组较对照组效果更显著,疗效持久。为进一步深入研究哮喘的治疗方法提供参考依据,具有一定的理论意义和临床价值。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:Use the way of Moxibustion of acupoint heat-sensitive to improve the symptom of asthma, and compared whih using the drug to Seretide see weather there is superiority. So as to provide a new therapeutic.and provide a reference for further in-depth study asthma and moxibustion treatment.Methods:using the center random allocation systom to devide 42 people into treatment group and control group by network. the treatment group use acupoints thermal Moxibustion and the control group use the British company GlaxoSmithKline’s Seretide.both groups were treated for 3 months, and followed up for 6 months.respectively, before treatment and at the end of 3 months,6 months after treatment using (Asthma Control Test, ACT) test in patients with symptomatic improvement. The ACT was made in2003 by asthma group of the Chinese Society of Respiratory Diseases Society.Results:1. Acupoints thermal treatment of moxibustion group at the end of 3 months, 6 months after treatment compared with before treatment, after both were significantly different, has statistically significant (P<0.05); 2. drug group at the end of treatment for 3 months,6 months after treatment compared with before treatment, after both were significantly different, has statistically significant(P<0.05); 3. moxibustion of acupoint heat-sensitive group and drug group at the end of treatment for 3 months,6 months after treatment were compared has significant difference which has statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:The observation group and control group both can improve the symptoms of chronic bronchial asthma, but the observation group was more significant, lasting effect than the control group. Provide a reference to further study the treatment of asthma, has some theoretical and clinical value.更多还原