【作者】 赵光勇；

【导师】 陈剩勇；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 政治学理论， 2010， 博士

【副题名】基于杭州个案的研究

【摘要】 中国的政府治理改革,取得了很大成就,但传统的治理模式并没有根本改变。政府全能主义的治理模式带来了一系列问题。在中国现代化转型的大背景下,必须寻找新的治理模式,既能应对全球化和不确定社会的风险,实现转型社会对政府治理绩效的要求,又能化解合法性的困局,满足日益高涨的民主诉求。参与式治理是民主理论和治理理论的结合,强调普通公民对政府决策和执行过程的直接参与,以赋权、参与、协作和网络为特征,是一种新型的既有“治理”的绩效、又有“参与”的民主的治理模式,是有效性和合法性的结合。杭州的参与式治理以“民主促民生”模式出现,从参与式治理的理念出发,通过赋权于公民,使各种利益相关者能够参与决策,共同管理公共事务,从而转变政府决策机制,优化政策执行过程,实现治理优化和城市生活品质提升。杭州的参与式治理包括公民决策参与和协作治理两个方面,形成了“开放式决策”、“市民投票”和“重大工程”建设民主参与等具体机制。杭州实践的特征主要有政府主导、民生领域的导入路径、多元主体和公民权力保障机制等。杭州的参与式治理,必须协调好参与式治理固有的几对矛盾：“参与”和“主导”、“地方知识”和“专业知识”以及“外部力量”和“内部力量”的关系。同时,杭州参与式治理还有其自身的特殊性。杭州实践的最大问题是政府的作用过于突出,除此之外,制度化程度低、公民参与动力不足和参与的领域、渠道有限也是需要加以改进的。杭州参与式治理还需要时间的检验。杭州“民主促民生”参与式治理实践,是杭州地方政府创新和城市治理的经验总结,杭州的经验不止于杭州,对于中国治理转型和地方政治发展,具有普遍的意义和价值。参与式治理通过转变政府决策过程,优化政策执行过程,密切官民关系,培育公民社会和塑造公民等,从而促进地方治理转型和“善治”的实现。更多还原

【Abstract】 The governance reform in China made great achievements, but the traditional model of governance has not fundamentally changed. The governance model of totalitarian government has brought a series of problems. In the context of China’s modernization transformation, we need to look for a new model of governance, in order to cope with globalization and uncertain risks through governance performance and meet the requirement of political legitimacy.Participatory Governance (PG) is an interdisciplinary theory from politics and public administration, and the combination of democratic theory and governance theory. PG stresses the participatory process that ordinary citizens engage in the decision-making and implementation processes. Empowerment, participation, collaboration, and network structure are PG characteristics. PG is a new type of governance, which affords the performance and the channels of citizen participation to meet the growing demands of effectiveness and legitimacy.In Hangzhou, "Democracy promoting people’s livelihood" pattern is a style PG. From the perspective of participatory governance, "Democracy promoting people’s livelihood" empowers citizens, and brings a variety of stakeholders to participate in decision-making and co-management of public affairs. Therefore it changes the government decision-making mechanism, and optimizes the policy implementation process. It achieves management optimization and upgrades the quality of urban life.Hangzhou model of PG, including two aspects of governance:citizens participating in decision-making and collaboration governance processes. It forms "open decision-making", "public voting" and democratic participation on "significant project" construction. The experience of the model mainly includes:government domination, people’s livelihood orientation, multiple subjects, and civil rights protection mechanism. Hangzhou model of PG should coordinate a few pairs of contradiction inherent in PG:"participation" and "domination", "local knowledge" and "professional knowledge" and "external forces" and "internal forces". At the same time, Hangzhou model has its own problem. The biggest problem is the role of government is too prominent. In addition, the lack of motivation of citizen participation and the limited areas and access of participation need to be improved.Hangzhou "Democracy promoting people’s livelihood" PG model is based on the local government innovation and urban governance experience. Fortunately, the experience of Hangzhou could be an example for other cities, whose universal value is significant for China’s political development and local governance in transition. PG fastens the transformation of government decision-making process, and optimizes the implementation of policies. It also improves relations between officials and the public, to foster civil society and shape citizens, so as to promote local governance restructuring and realize "good governance".更多还原