【作者】 贾焕银；

【导师】 谢晖；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法学理论， 2008， 博士

【摘要】 本文主要运用法社会学——规范实证的复合分析方法,以和谐司法主义为分析背景,以具体的漏洞补充方法为轴心,较为细致地分析了漏洞补充与民间规范关联性问题。漏洞补充与民间规范关联性研究的出路是真正地走向漏洞补充的法社会学分析和民间法实证的规范分析,并使二者密切结合起来。在这种双向互换的分析架构中,规范实证分析居于主导地位,即使就漏洞补充过程及具体方法的法社会学分析而言,也是一种规范分析框架中的法社会学分析。论文的基本结构分为导入——总述——分述三个部分。这一结构是围绕漏洞补充本质及在其基础上产生的具体补充方法建构形成的。漏洞补充本质上是一个具体规范的建构过程。从功能主义的视角来看,法律漏洞乃是法律的实然的社会功能严重不合于应然的规范功能达到一定程度的状态。民间法是一个诠释性概念,具有社会自规范化和法律社会化的双重属性。本文主要研究了漏洞补充与民间规范关联性的三个重要方面:一是在分析功能主义视角下法律漏洞概念的认定问题和漏洞补充事实和价值两大路径取向基础上,论证了民间规范作为重要漏洞补充因素的合理性;二是对漏洞补充与民间规范关联性的框架性分析。二者之间的关联性应在一个复合的分析性框架中进行:一个是外部的、社会性的法律性与法律相结合的分析框架,另一个是内部的、规范性的在法律的形式推理和实质推理中形式性依据与实质性依据紧密结合的分析框架。三是法律方法总是因民族、文化的差异,随社会历史的变迁而流变,各种具体的漏洞补充方法总具有不同向度的民间法性。上述三个方面,特别是第二、三个方面共同构成了论文分述具体漏洞补充方法与民间规范关联性的理论基础。论文(从第四章至第六章)详细地分析了类推适用、目的性限缩、目的性扩张和法律拟制等具体漏洞补充方法的基本理论问题、民间法性和在各种具体漏洞补充方法中以各种类型的民间规范填补法律漏洞的法社会学——规范实证的复合分析过程。更为重要的是,以上述复合的分析框架为指导,在判例阅读基础上,本文力图建构出这一过程具体的、真实的面向来。具体漏洞补充方法的民间法性这一观点,特别是在第四章关于类推方法的部分中得到了较为详细地分析。本文之研究是因应和谐司法主义时代发展要求的产物,不仅是对漏洞补充与民间规范关联性,甚至是对法律方法与民间规范关联性问题进行系统、全面和深入研究的初步尝试。这一尝试期能开启规范与方法谐合研究之路并助益于当下和谐社会视域中民间规范司法运用之实践。更多还原

【Abstract】 By the multiple methods of sociology of law-normative and positive analysis, this paper analyzes the relationship between the loophole-filling and civil norms on the basis of harmonious justice and the concrete loophole-filling methods.This research lies in trending towards the sociology of law analysis for the loophole-filling and the normative-positive analysis for folk law, and makes the two really related together. In the bidirectional interchangeable framework, the normative-positive analysis is situated in the leading position, even as the sociology of law analysis for the process of loophole-filling and concrete methods are concerned, the sociology of law analysis is in the normative-positive framework. The basic structure of this paper is divided into three sections: introduction, overview and concrete analysis. This structure is constructed on the basis of essence of the loophole-filling and its concrete methods.The nature of loophole-filling is essentially the process of constructing concrete norms. Legal loophole is the state that legal social function as it is does not severely harmonize with legal normative function in terms of functionalism. Folk law that has the double attributes of social self-standardization and legal socialization is a hermeneutical concept.This paper mainly studies the three important aspects of the relationship between the loophole-filling and civil norms: firstly, it demonstrates the rationality of civil norms as the factor of loophole-filling on the basis of definition of the valid Legal loophole and factual valuable orientations of the loophole-filling; secondly, it analyzed the framework of the relationship, which should be analyzed in the multiple framework, including the external social one and the inner normative one, between the loophole-filling and civil norms, lastly, all kinds of concrete legal methods have the characteristics of folk laws of the different directions and change with the flowage of legal methods for the differences between nations and cultures.The above-mentioned three aspects, especially the second and third one jointly constitute the theoretical principle of the paper. This paper (from 4-6) analyzes the fundamental theories and the civil characteristics of analogical reasoning, restrictive /extensive interpretation of purposiveness and legal fiction in details, simultaneously, it analyzes the multiple framework of compensating for legal loopholes with civil norms in the process of all kinds of concrete methods of the loophole-filling by examples, more importantly, under the multiple framework’s guidance, it tries its best to construct the process of compensating for legal loopholes with civil norms in the process of all kinds of concrete methods of the loophole -filling. The characteristics of concrete loophole-filling legal methods of folk law are demonstrated in the tui-lei methods in the section of chapter four.In accordance with the demand of harmonious justice in our age, this paper is a systematical, comprehensive and preliminary endeavor for the relationship not only between methods of the loophole-filling and civil norms but also between legal methods and civil norms. We hope the endeavor will able to start a way out for the research of the relationship between methods and norms, and will be beneficial to our harmonious justice practice.更多还原