节点文献

城市化进程中的地方政府政治理转型

The Governance Transformation of Local Government in the Urbanization Process

【作者】 冯涛

【导师】 郁建兴;

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 , 行政管理, 2012, 博士

【摘要】 城市化是人类进步的必要经历过程,是一国或地区走向现代化的必经之路。中国也不例外,城市化业已成为我国经济社会发展的重大战略选择。而城市化与政府治理尤其地方政府治理密切相关,在某种程度上,城市化过程也是地方政府职能转型与治理创新的过程。国内外学界就城市化与地方政府治理开展了大量研究,并积累了丰富的研究成果。学界普遍认为,地方政府治理调整是影响城市化发展的重要因素,而城市化进程也是影响地方政府治理变迁不可或缺的条件。但学者们多倾向于从城市化视野解读地方政府治理变迁或者从地方政府治理改革的角度诠释城市化发展。事实上,城市化发展与地方政府治理转型之间存在着表征关系,城市化进程不仅影响了地方政府治理改革,而且地方政府治理转型本身就属于城市化过程,经历了城市化发展,地方政府治理变得更加现代化。我们应以一种更为综合的视角看待相关问题的研究。基于这样的认识,本文提出了城市化进程中地方政府治理转型的分析框架。在城市化进程中,地方政府得以强化其公共服务与社会管理等本质职能,而且还可实现治理体制机制的超越与创新。相应地,地方政府必须从产业、空间与人口等城市化各要素协调发展出发,推进职能转型,并在重构自身与市场、社会关系的基础上,创新治理体制机制,以更好地回应城市化并促进城市化发展。基于“前沿”案例预示其他案例发展趋势的优势,我们选择了浙江省慈溪市等先发地区的城市化经验开展案例研究。慈溪案例研究结果验证了分析框架的预设,但慈溪经验具有一定的特殊性,而且,相比分析框架,现实经验显得更为复杂,由此,我们将慈溪案例与重庆市南川区案例进行比较,从中探讨分析框架的适用性,提炼分析框架适用条件,并在此基础上,对分析框架进行完善与拓展。城市化进程中的地方政府治理转型受制于一系列现实因素,具体表现为四大类别,即资源禀赋结构、产业结构与资本有机构成、地理地貌等现实因素;地方经济社会发展趋势及其定位等未来发展趋势因素;全球化、国家层面的政策安排、跨区域制度可衔接性等宏观条件;社会异质性程度、公众作为市场主体与利益主体地位的确立,作为参与治理的社会主体地位的确立等微观要素。在城市化进程中,地方政府既要从实际出发,在尊重客观事实的基础上推进治理转型,又要从变化着的客观条件出发,适时地促进现实条件的改变,为自身治理的现代转型拓宽空间。

【Abstract】 It is inevitable for human society towards modernization to experience urbanization, which is also the significant strategy of current economic and social development in China. The urbanization process is closely related to the corresponding governance transition of local government, namely the urbanization process also include governance transition of local government on a certain degree.Foreign or home scholars have conducted considerable research which focus on the problems of urbanization and the governance of local government. Most research agree that local government governance is one of the most important factors for urbanization, while urbanization is one of the most essential conditions for local government governance as well. However, most literature is inclined to interpret the governance transition of local government from the perspective of urbanization, or to explain the urbanization process based on local government governance view. Actually, not only does urbanization effect local governance, but the governance transition of local government is also a part of urbanization process, which means that they are marked with each other. We should study on the relative problems from some more comprehensive perspectives. Hence, the paper would propose an analytical framework:the governance transition of local government in the process of urbanization. Local government would strengthen its own essential functions as public service and social management, and even transcend as well as innovate the present system and mechanism in the urbanization process. Currently, local government should transfer its function based on the coordinative development among industry, space and population, and then innovate the governance system and mechanism by means of reconstruction the relationship among government, market and society in order to response to as well as promote urbanization.We select the urbanization experience of some prior areas for case studies such as Cixi city Zhejiang Province, based on its advantage to foreshow the development of the others. The study of Cixi case proves the framework’s presupposition, while there is some particularity for Cixi case, which is more complicated than the framework’s presupposition. Therefore, we would do a comparative study on the cases of Cixi and Nanchuan district Chongqing city, from which we try to explore the applicability of the framework and conclude its applicable conditions. On the basis of that, we would improve and extend the framework.The governance transition of local government in urbanization context is restricted to some practical factors that would be classified as four categories. We consider resources endowment, industry structure, organic composition of capital and geography landforms as current conditions, and the tendency of economic and social development as future conditions, and globalization, national policies and the linkage of cross-region policies as macro-conditions, and the social heterogeneity, the establishment of the public status of market and social subject as micro conditions. Not only should the local government transform the way of governance from actual conditions, but also alters the objective conditions which would obtain more opportunities for the modern transformation of its own governance.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 浙江大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2012年 10期
  • 【分类号】D625;F299.2
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】1396
节点文献中: