【作者】 王立端；

【导师】 巴新生；

【作者基本信息】 福建师范大学 ， 史学理论及史学史， 2011， 博士

【摘要】 亚细亚生产方式问题首先涉及怎样理解亚细亚生产方式概念,应该在马克思所阐述的公有制——私有制——公有制这一人类社会普遍规律的框架下解读亚细亚生产方式概念,可以选择四个视角,即马克思恩格斯探寻原始社会、农村公社的过程,他们形成亚细亚生产方式概念的研究方法以及研究人类早期社会历史的指导思想等视角以解读亚细亚生产方式概念的涵义和性质,结论是：亚细亚生产方式概念是马克思恩格斯以所有制为核心考察印度等国遗存的农村公社而抽象出来的公社公有制的一个假设概念,其所指是原始共产主义,其能指则是比较具体的印度等国的农村公社。探讨新中国成立后近五十年亚细亚生产方式问题的争论史,不难发现,亚细亚生产方式问题的争论,其内在动力是马克思主义史学本身的发展,同时也与建国后探索社会主义建设的道路和马克思主义史学怎样为社会主义现实服务紧密相连,当然还与各个时期的政治环境和学术氛围有关。亚细亚生产方式问题的争论构成了建国后马克思主义史学发展的主干,由此衍生出了中国古代史研究中许多具体历史问题的争论,包括中国古史分期问题、中国古代社会的特点、农民战争问题、土地所有制形式问题、奴隶制度问题等的深入研究,同时还拓展到人类社会历史发展规律、马克思东方社会理论以及中国和东方社会历史实际的深入研究,收获了许多重要的理论成果,对探索中国特色的社会主义道路提供了重要的理论支持,也推进了马克思主义历史理论和史学理论的中国化进程,推进了中国史体系的构建和重构的过程,促进了中国马克思主义史学体系的形成。此外亚细亚生产方式问题的争论还反映了中国马克思主义史学的历史认知模式,即重视理论模式的运用,彻底改变了中国传统史学重经验考据的历史认知模式,转而重视历史发展规律性的探索。因此,研究亚细亚生产方式问题的争论史仍然具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 The first problem of the Asiatic mode of production is how to understand the concept of it. It should be understood under public ownership-private ownership-public ownership of the human society universal framework of Marx.You can choose four perspectives to understand the meaning and quality of the Asiatic mode of production is that the process of Marx and Engels to seek primitive society and the rural communes, the research methods of formulating the concept of the Asiatic mode of production, the guiding ideology of the study of human early social history and so on. The conclusion is that the concept of the Asiatic mode of production is a hypothesis abstracted by Marx and Engels who make the ownership as the core to examine survival of the rural commune of India and other countries. It is the original meaning of primitive communism, it could be more specific to the India of the rural commune.To explore the history of the Asiatic mode of production of new China was founded in the past 50 years, it is not difficulty to discover that the development of Marxist historiography is the inner impetus of argument, and have closely relevance with exploration of socialism construction after the founding of new China and historiography how to serve socialism reality, of course, it closely connected with the relevant academic political environment and atmosphere. The Asiatic mode of production’s argument is the main force of historiography development after the founding of new China. It derived many specific history questions’argument in the study of Chinese ancient history. It included intensive study in ancient Chinese history periodization’ problem,ancient Chinese social characteristic, peasant wars’problem, land ownership’problem, slavery problem. It also study human social historical laws and Marxism orient social theory and China and orient social historical reality. It has got lots of important social theory results and provides great theory support to explore socialism with Chinese characteristic road and promotes the Sinicization of Marxism historical theory and historiography theory and promotes the process of building and re-organizing of Chinese historical system and promotes the form of Chinese Marxism historiography’s system. In addition, the Asiatic mode of production’s argument reflects cognitive patterns of Chinese Marxism historiography, which attaches great importance to the theoretical models. It thoroughly changes cognitive patterns of the experience of texture criticism of Chinese traditional historiography, its importance to exploration of the laws of historical development. Therefore, the study of the argument about the history of the Asiatic mode of production still have important theoretical and practical significance.更多还原