节点文献

两岸报纸科学新闻报导框架与新闻生产研究

The Study of Science News Frame and News Production between China and Taiwan

【作者】 郭咏萱

【导师】 张国良;

【作者基本信息】 上海交通大学 , 工商管理, 2011, 博士

【副题名】以「节能减排」新闻为例

【摘要】 本论文系针对两岸报纸科学新闻报导框架及新闻生产进行研究;以中国大陆的《南方日报》与台湾的《中国时报》节能减排新闻为例,以资料分析法整理相关理论文献后,并运用内容分析法分析2009年7月1日到2010年6月30日的节能减排新闻,以分析其报导框架,最后,透过深度访谈法针对节能减排新闻生产过程进行研究,并进一步,解析其影响因素。本研究之研究问题分述如下:一、《南方日报》与台湾的《中国时报》之节能减排新闻的报导框架为何?二、《南方日报》与台湾的《中国时报》之节能减排新闻的生产过程为何?以及其影响因素为何?三、比较两岸节能减排新闻生产有何异同?研究结果发现:一、两岸报纸媒体节能减排新闻有10种报导框架;二、两岸报纸媒体节能减排新闻生产过程有12点相同之处;三、两岸报纸媒体节能减排新闻生产过程有10点相异之处;四、节能减排已不再是单纯的科学新闻,而是复杂且多元的社会性科学议题。最后,本研究亦提出5项日后可进行的研究建议,以及针对新闻实务界可持续努力的3项具体建议。

【Abstract】 This dissertation is devoted to study the News Frame of Science News and the News Production in newspaper between China and Taiwan. It uses content analysis to analyze the issue Energy Conservation & Carbon Reduction in Nanfang Daily and China Times of Taiwan from the 1st of July in 2009 to the 30th of June in 2010. It also analyses the News Production to deconstruct the influences by in-depth interview.The aims of this dissertation are listed as below:1. To analyze that what is the News Frame of the issue Energy Conservation & Carbon Reduction in Nanfang Daily and China Times of Taiwan.2. To find out that what is the News Production and influences to the issue Energy Conservation & Carbon Reduction in Nanfang Daily and China Times of Taiwan? / How were the News produced and what influences effect the production?3. To discover the differentiation and the similarity in the production/producing process in the issue of Energy Conservation & Carbon Reduction between China and Taiwan.The findings from this study are listed as below:1. There are 10 News Frames in writing / reporting the issue of Energy Conservation & Carbon Reduction in China and Taiwan.2. There are 12 similarities in the News Production process between China and Taiwan.3. There are 10 differentiations in the News Production process between China and Taiwan.4. The issue Energy Conservation & Carbon Reduction is not only science news, but also the socio-scientific issue.Finally, the study also raised five recommendations for future research, as well as raised three specific recommendations for journalists.

节点文献中: