【作者】 何绍辉；

【导师】 吴毅；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 社会学， 2011， 博士

【副题名】红村扶贫开发的故事

【摘要】 本文以中部J省红村扶贫开发故事为研究对象,试图通过对故事发生、发展及其结束的全过程描述、理解与解释,来探讨转型期党政机关定点扶贫的本质特征及其政治逻辑与治理逻辑,并在此基础上探究与回应农村基层治理与国家政权建设等重大理论与现实问题。为此,笔者通过对红村扶贫开发为期一年的亲身参与及观察,对整个扶贫开发历程有了基本把握。论文通过以扶贫开发“各项工作”为接点,讲述了故事中的权力运作及其策略技术；通过以国家权力与地方性权力的互动为核心,考察了故事中两种权力力量的碰撞、磨合与共存。在此基础上,笔者试图获得对于党政机关定点扶贫开发过程的整体认知,获得对于扶贫开发过程中的权力、技术、关系与策略的解读,获得对于农村基层治理与国家政权建设基本逻辑的理解。全文通过对扶贫开发工作中工作组(国家)、地方政府与村民之间的互动关系的考察,获得了如下基本认识：第一,运动式治理是转型期党政机关定点扶贫开发工作的本质特征,也是转型期国家基层治理的重要逻辑；转型期运动式治理之所以广泛存在并发挥作用,从根本上而言是后全能体制的约制,亦是集权式治理逻辑的延续。第二,人民公社解体、农业税费取消之后,国家权力并未完全退出乡村社会；国家与乡村社会关系的实质性变化,并非是国家权力全面退出乡村社会所能简单表述,从某种意义上而言是治理性而非政治性变化,其只不过是国家控制乡村和进行基层治理的战略、策略与技术发生了根本性的变化,即正在从一种身体治理走向技术性治理、从全能型控制走向选择性控制。第三,国家政权建设的基本方向应是加强基础性权力的构建与促进现代官僚制度的理性化,转变基层治理战略,充实基层治理资源,使运动式治理逐渐转向制度性治理,以实现现代国家的成功构建。更多还原

【Abstract】 The paper regards the village Hong’s story on the poverty alleviation and development as the research subject. With the whole description、understanding and interpretation on the beginning、development and closure of the story, The dissertation is to explore the essential feature、political logic and governance logic on the poverty alleviation of the party and government organs, and then explore and answer the theoretical and practical issues such as the rural grass-roots governance and state-making and so on.For this reason, the author participated and observed the village’s poverty alleviation and development for one year, grasped the whole process on the poverty alleviation and development. Regarding the whole work as the contact, the paper narrates the operation of power and its strategy technologies in the story, with the interaction of the state power and the local power, investigates the collision、running and coexist of two types of power of the story. On this basis, the author attempts to acquire the overall cognitive on the poverty alleviation of the party and government organs, to obtain the interpretation on the power、technology、relationship and strategy, and to gain the comprehension on basic logic of the rural grass-roots governance and the state-making.The dissertation gathers the following basic congnitive fruits based on the interaction of the Working Group(state)、local government and peasant:Firstly, the campaign-styled governance is the essential feature of the poverty alleviation of the party and government organs, and the important logic of the rural grass-roots governance of the state as well; the campaign-styled governance exists and exerts owing to the restriction of the post-totalitarian and the continuance of the centralized governance logic.Secondly, after the end of the people’s commune and the abolishment of the agricultural taxes and fees, the state power withdraws the rural society partly; the substantial changes of the relationship of the state and rural society, the state power withdrew the rural society is only the little part, the change is the governance rather than the political, the state control and the strategy, tactics and technology of the grass-roots governance is the fundamental changing, in other words, is from the body treatment to the technical governance、from the all-around control to the selective control.Thirdly, the basic orientation of the state-making is to reinforce the construction of the infrastructural power and to promote the rational of the modern bureaucracy governance system, and transform the strategy of the grass-roots governance, enrich the resources of the grass-roots governance, so as to push the campaign-styled governance into the institutional governance, and to achieve the construction of modern state.更多还原