节点文献

结构可靠度计算方法研究

Research of Structural Reliability Analysis Method

【作者】 胡鸣

【导师】 韩大建; 苏成;

【作者基本信息】 华南理工大学 , 结构工程, 2010, 硕士

【摘要】 工程结构在施工建造及使用过程中,需要承受设备、人群、车辆等荷载的作用以及风、雨、雪等自然环境的作用;同时,工程结构还有建造费用高和使用周期长的特点,工程结构的安全可靠与否,不但影响着社会生产实践,而且还关系到人民的生命和财产安全。因此,工程结构应要求具有一定的可靠性,才能保证结构在规定的使用期内能够满足设计要求的各项使用功能。结构可靠度理论是处理结构不确定性、进行结构性能评估的有力工具。现有基本的结构可靠度计算方法可分为一次二阶矩法、蒙特卡罗法和响应面法。一次二阶矩法可以方便用于功能函数为显式表达的情况,但对于可靠性要求较高的结构,其计算精度有时不能满足工程需要。蒙特卡罗法可应用于隐式功能函数情况下可靠度的计算,但该法往往需借助大量的样本试验,计算效率很低。响应面法利用响应面函数逼近真实的功能函数,是当前解决隐式功能函数情况下结构可靠度计算的有效方法,但是如何构造逼真、稳定、方便的响应面函数是该领域研究的重要内容。本文总结了国内外结构可靠度的研究现状,在对现有结构可靠度计算方法进行深入研究的基础上,寻求计算精度和计算效率较高的结构可靠度计算方法,以期能将结构可靠度理论更好地应用于实际工程领域。本文的主要工作包括:(1)系统阐述显式结构功能函数的可靠度计算方法,并对这些方法的计算原理及其优缺点进行深入研究,为本文方法的提出打下理论基础。(2)对于隐式功能函数的可靠度计算方法,本文着重阐述多项式响应面法、人工神经网络响应面法和支持向量机响应面法的计算原理及其优缺点,并对参数选取和取值进行讨论。(3)借鉴二次二阶矩法,本文提出两种改进的响应面法,即二次多项式响应面—曲率拟合法和二次多项式响应面—拉普拉斯渐进积分方法。本文的主要结论有:(1)二次二阶矩法是以一次二阶矩法为基础,并对一次二阶矩法的计算结果进行二次修正,在多数情况下有着更好的计算精度。其中曲率拟合法的计算精度主要取决于二次多项式对结构功能函数的逼近程度,而拉普拉斯渐进积分方法的计算精度主要受验算点精度的影响。(2)二次多项式响应面法对于大多数隐式功能函数,都能准确得到验算点,有较好的计算精度和计算效率,且原理简单,操作方便。但是对于一些特殊的高度非线性功能函数,二次多项式响应面法不能准确获得验算点或者无法收敛。支持向量机响应面法对于一些特殊高度非线性功能函数,在合适的参数取值下,能够准确获得验算点,不仅有良好的收敛性,而且有效减少了计算量,提高了计算效率。但是支持向量机响应面法原理较为复杂,而且理论上没有给出参数选取的依据,本文通过算例验证,给出了较通用的参数取值。在BP神经网络响应面法中,由于神经网络响应面函数为高度非线性的函数,改进一次二阶矩法很难准确获得验算点。同时初始样本点的选取对BP神经网络响应面法的计算结果影响较大,由于理论上也无法给出选取的依据,本文采用拉丁超立方体方法抽取样本点,并通过算例验证,给出了较通用的参数取值。(3)传统响应面法在计算结构的可靠指标时需结合改进一次二阶矩法,当结构非线性程度较高时,计算误差较大。本文针对传统响应面法的缺点,提出了两种改进的响应面法,即二次多项式响应面—曲率拟合法和二次多项式响应面—拉普拉斯渐进积分方法。并通过算例分析表明,本文方法操作简便、在保证较高的计算效率前提下,有效地提高了计算精度。

【Abstract】 During construction and service, structures are subjected to the various loads, such as the self weight, the weight of equipments, crowd, and vehicle and to the impact from natural environment such as wind, rain, snow and so on. Also, structures have characteristics of high construction cost and long working period, and their reliability not only influences on the production practice, but also relations to the safety of people’s life and property. Therefore, structures must have certain reliability to make sure that they can satisfy each operational function in prescriptive period.Structural reliability theory is a powerful tool to solve structure uncertainties and evaluate structural performance. The present usually reliability analysis method for engineering structures are Monte Carlo Simulate (MCS), First-order Second-moment method (FOSM) and Reliability Surface Method (RSM). FOSM is usually used for the explicit performance function, and the accuracy of FOSM can not satisfy the engineering requirement sometimes for the structures which have higher reliability requirement. MCS has to use a large number of sample test and the efficiency is low. The implicit performance function is approached with RSM, and it’s an effective way to solve the implicit performance function reliability analysis, and the key issue of RSM is how to construct a high-fidelity, stable, easy-used response surface function with fewer samples.This thesis concludes domestic and foreign research present situation of the structure reliability. Based on a study of present reliability analysis methods, the main task of this thesis is to find a more efficient algorithm and try to apply it to engineering practice.The main work of this thesis is as follows:(1) On calculating methods of reliability for the explicit performance function, a clear understanding has been formed on the computation principle and the advantages and disadvantages of the present algorithms. It laid a good theoretical foundation for the algorithm proposed in the thesis.(2) On calculating methods of reliability for the implicit performance function, this thesis firstly elaborates on the computation principle and the advantages and disadvantages of Polynomial Response Surface Method, Artificial Neural Networks Response Surface Method and Support Vector Regression Response Surface Method, and then discusses the selection of parameters.(3) Two improved response surface method has been put forward which is named Quadratic Polynomial Response Surface-Curvature Fitting Method and Quadratic Polynomial Response Surface-Laplace integral Method.The main conclusions obtained in this thesis are as follow:(1) Based on FOSM, Second-order second-moment method modifies the results of FOSM, and has better calculation accuracy. The calculation accuracy of curvature fitting method depends on the degree of performance function fitted by quadratic polynomial. The calculation accuracy of laplace integral depends on the value of design point.(2) Quadratic Polynomial Response Surface Method whose computation principle is simple can calculates the precise value of design point for most implicit performance function. But for some special highly nonlinear structure, Quadratic Polynomial Response Surface Method can’t get precise value of design point or can’t be convergent. By contrast, Support Vector Regression Response Surface Method has good convergent, and it also reduce calculation amount. But the computation principle of Support Vector Regression Response Surface Method is complex, and the selection of its parameters isn’t proved in theory. The values of its parameters are given in this thesis. Because Artificial Neural Networks Response Surface functions is highly nonlinear function, so it’s difficult to get precise value of design point in theory. Because the selection of initially sample isn’t proved in theory, Latin Hypercube Sampling has been put forward in this thesis, and effective parameter values are proposed proved by numerical examples.(3) Two improved response surface method has been put forward which is named Quadratic Polynomial Response Surface-Curvature Fitting Method and Quadratic Polynomial Response Surface-Laplace integral Method. Proved by numerical examples, these methods are easy to operate and effectively improve the calculation accuracy. Furthermore these methods apply to engineering practice well.

节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络