【作者】 王迪；

【导师】 易继明；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 民商法学， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 当代中国，科学技术被公认为第一生产力。由于科学技术革新的日新月异，决定了科学技术进步的立法与修订也应当与时俱进。本文通过剖析科学技术研究本身的性质，考察发达国家有关科学技术的法律规范，来研究我国科学技术进步法的立法与修订。研究方法是以我国1993年的科学技术进步法作为参比，从2007年新法的内容及特点入手，着重讨论和研究了新的科学技术进步法修订的成就和不足，并为进一步修订和出台相关配套法规提出建设性意见。本文从重点基础概念铺开，介绍了我国的科学技术进步法的立法背景，透视了域外相关立法经验，分析了2007年科学技术进步法相对于1993年科学技术进步法进行修改的特点，重点阐述了对此次修改的意见：主要是针对2007年科学技术进步法在科技资源优化整合的规定方面，由于过于侧重强调“硬件设施”方面的资源共享，而忽视了“科技信息共享”在信息时代条件下的科学研究中的巨大作用。在“宽容失败，鼓励创新”的规定方面，其立法的基本出发点值得进一步商议，并且值得重视的是我国当前急需要建立和健全一套公开、公平、公正的科技评估体制。参考国外的相关科技法规，作者提出了建设基于“学科性的”或“机构性的”开放获取国家资源库，实现国家“科技软实力”的开放共享；基于“委托评估”模式，实现政府监管与评估执行的“主体”分离，并引入多元化的科技评估标准；通过在高校和科技院所引进“终身聘任制”，鼓励自主创新、学术自由、与科研诚信。更多还原

【Abstract】 In nowada ys China, science and technology have been well known as the prima ryproductive force.The nature of fast ever-cha nging improvement and innovation for scienceand technology determines that the legislation and amend ment of the Law of Science andTechnology Advancement must catch up in order to keep updated.Through examining thenature of scientific research per se and reviewing the law and regulations related to scienceand technology in developed countries, the legislation and amend ment of our nation’s Lawof Science and Technology Advancement were investigated in this thesis. With its 1993version as a comparative counterpart, the content and characteristics of the 2007 new lawwere studied first, while more discussion and argument were focused on its achievementand deficiency derived from the amend ment in 2007, and constructive proposal wasdeveloped for further amend ment or enforcement of related regulations. This thesis wasstarted by examining important fundamenta l concepts, then the legislation background forthe Chinese Law of Science and Technology Advancement was introduced and relatedlega l experience in foreign countries was reviewed, which was followed further by adetailed analysis of the new features resulted from the 2007 amend ments. Finally, it wasfocused on constructive opinions and proposals for the 2007 amend ments.In the respect ofoptimizing and integrating science and technology resources, the 2007 Law of Science andTechnology Advancement emphasized too much“scientific infrastructure”but ignored thetremendous role of“scientific information share”in the process of research during thisinformation age. With respect to the regulation on“forgiving loss, encouraginginnovation”, its basic standing point for the law, which is worth further discussion, couldbe flawed, while neglecting the urgency to set up and perfect a science and technologyevaluation system with“openness, fairness, and justness”. Referring to correspond ingforeign legislation in science and technology, it was argued that a Nationa l Open AccessDatabase should be built up based on a“disciplina ry”or“institutiona l”principle in orderfor the open-share of nationa l“soft scientific strength”; a“government contractor”modeshould be preferred for the science and technology evaluation system, thus a separation of the overseeing government body from the enacting evaluation unit will be realized; and adiversified evaluation standard should be introduced and enacted; a“tenure-track”systemshould be imported to our higher education and academic institutes, which shouldencourage independent innovation, freedom in academia, and credit in scientific research.更多还原