专利等同侵权研究

【作者】 李浩；

【导师】 陈乃蔚；

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 ， 法律， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 等同侵权是专利侵权判定中的一项重要原则,它起源于美国。后来随着科技的发展,许多国家在专利侵权审判中也引入了等同侵权理论。等同侵权理论的构建是为了避免被控侵权人试图通过对专利技术进行一些细微的非实质性的改变搭专利权人的“便车”获得不正当利益,从而逃避专利侵权的法律责任。但是,由于专利权本身的特性,等同侵权的判断十分复杂,使得等同侵权的适用成为一个难题。本文主要介绍了专利侵权的构成要件,专利权的保护范围,探究了等同侵权产生的必要性和它在美国专利诉讼中的发展情况,对比了各国在等同侵权适用标准上的异同；文章从司法实务的角度出发,对如何正确适用等同侵权判定专利侵权寻找解决途径：包括正确确定等同侵权适用的主体、客体,等同侵权判定中对比的时间、眼光基准、等同侵权比较对象,等同侵权适用的标准,以及几种特殊情形下等同侵权的适用；笔者还论述了专利侵权判定中对等同侵权适用的抗辩,努力形成关于等同侵权理论的系统知识,以更好的解决专利纠纷。最后,笔者思考了与等同侵权有关的一些问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 Doctrine of equivalents infringement is an important standard in judgment of patent infringement. It comes from United States. As the development of science, many countries start to use the Doctrine of equivalent. The aim of using Doctrine of equivalent is to prevent the accused infringer from escaping liability though changing the technology that is not essential to the patent claims to get the intrest illegally. But it is very difficult to use the doctrine because the equivalent infringement has its own characteristic that is different from patent literal infringement.This thesis maily introduces the elements of the patent infringement, and discusses the the necessity of developing the Doctrine of equivalent and the development of the equivalent infringement theroy in the USA, and it compares with the difference in the doctrine of equivalent’s application standard between the different countries.At the same time, it deals with some problems on the process of how to correctly make decision of the equivalent infringement on the base of study lot of cases in the justice practice, for example, who to use the doctrine, the eye benchmark of judging equivalent infringement, what are the objects that should be compared, the standard used in the process of judging equivalent infringement and using the doctrine equivalent infringement in some special situation.This acicle also dicusseshow to defense the use of doctrine of equivalent in the justice practice, and the author intents to built the systematic knowledge of the doctrine of equivalent to resolve the patent dispute effectively.And at last,the auther thinks some questions about the equivalant infringement.更多还原