【作者】 孙蕴韬；

【导师】 刘金平；

【作者基本信息】 河南大学 ， 基础心理学， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 决策是个体在日常生活中不可避免的重要活动,个体面对风险时如何决策是决策研究的主要对象,而维持现状偏差描述了一种在个体决策时经常出现的行为倾向,这种倾向使个体偏好那些能维持现状的选项。以往决策研究中个体差异对决策结果的影响,往往被看成是误差项而有意无意地忽略了,对于个体特质与决策的关系实证研究也比较少,目前已研究的个体差异变量主要有人格、认知能力、认知风格、年龄等。应对方式作为个体差异的一个因素是指个体在面对挫折或压力时所采用的认知和行为方式。目前,关于应对方式与决策之间关系的研究较少,仅有的几篇文献也都集中在职业决策领域。卷入程度与决策关系虽有研究者关注,都仅仅考虑到了卷入程度这一情境性因素,而把处在情景中的决策者自身特征忽略掉了,所得结论也必然不能反映决策时的真实情况。本研究是在以往研究的基础上,考查个体在面临不同的决策任务(简单决策情境和连续决策情景)时,个体差异(应对方式)和情景性因素(卷入程度)对维持现状偏差的影响。考察不同应对方式的个体,在面对不同卷入程度的情景时,是否会表现出维持现状偏差。本研究可分为三个部分。预备实验,筛选出供正式实验使用的决策情景。实验一采用决策研究中流行的情景案例配合问卷调查的方法,以一个模拟现实决策情景为决策任务,考察应对方式的不同和卷入程度的高低在简单决策情景中对维持现状偏差的影响。结果表明:应对方式对赞成维持现状的倾向程度有显著的主效应,应对方式和卷入程度两者的交互作用显著。实验二以一个模拟决策情景为决策任务,考察应对方式的不同和卷入程度的高低在连续决策情景中对维持现状偏差的影响。结果表明:连续决策情景中,应对方式对被试是否表现出维持现状偏差有非常显著的影响,积极应对者更倾向于改变现状;而卷入程度对维持现状偏差的影响不大,卷入程度的不同不能有效地预测被试是否维持现状。更多还原

【Abstract】 Decision making is an important and unavoidable activity in our daily life,when an individual facing some risk scene ,how the decision is made is the main problem in decision making research .Status quo bias describes a behaviour tendency which occurs disproportionately often when individuals making their decisions,individuals under this influence will prefer to select a previously chosen alternative or a option which can maintain status quo.Early research about individual differences’ influence to the decision result was ignored as some kind of errors.At the present time only few researches concern the relationship between individual differences and decision making:personality,cognition and age was involved in those researches as individual differences.Coping style as one factor of individual differences was defined as "the adopted cognitive and behavioral style when facing setback or pressure",researches were that the relationship between coping style and decison making was not too thick,the few papers about this question were concentrated on the field of career decision making.Some researchers had studied the relationship between involvement and decision making indeed,but they didn’t put the involvement and the coping style together to research their influence to decision making,thus their conclusion can’t describe the reality of decision.The present study is based on early researches,focus that people facing different decision mission(simple decision or sequential decision),how the individual differences(coping style) and situational factor influence on status quo bias.Pretest:pick up two decision scene for formal study.Study 1 on questionnaire matching fabled decision scene method which is popular in decision making research,one fabled decision scene as the task,study how the individual differences(coping style) and situational factor(involvment) influence on status quo bias in simple decision.The result shows that coping style and involvement have significant interaction effect on objects’ attitude to maintain the status quo.Study 2 on fabled decision scene as the task,study how the individual differences(coping style) and situational factor(involvment) influence on status quo bias in sequential decision.The result shows that status quo bias depend on the object’s coping style is positive or negative,the level of involvement can’t predict the status quo bias.更多还原