【作者】 刘明；

【导师】 王克稳；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 行政执法和解制度在立法上没有规定,但在实践中的应用都一直存在。由于立法上的缺位,使得行政执法和解在实践中的运用出现混乱状态,阻碍了行政执法和解制度的作用的积极发挥。行政执法和解制度是在行政执法过程中,行政主体对拟作出的行政决定所依据的事实或法律关系经调查仍不能确定,或者由于调查所需费用过于巨大,为达成行政目的,而与行政相对人相互让步并达成书面协议的活动。这与调解、行政诉讼中的和解有着很大的区别。行政执法和解制度具有现代协商民主的理念,强调公平与效率的平衡、形式法治与实质法治的平衡、公益与私益的平衡。美国、德国、我国台湾地区等在和解制度上进行了积极地有益的探索,在立法上,实践中,强调合意性解决纠纷,这给我国行政执法和解制度构建提供了宝贵的经验。行政执法和解制度在我国有一定的可行性和现实基础,为了发挥其解决纠纷的功能,需规定其运行的原则、范围、程序、监督等,从而更好的保护行政相对人的利益,促使行政主体依法行政、服务行政,适应社会发展的价值目标。更多还原

【Abstract】 There is not regulation about the system of adminstrative law enforcement in legislation, but it has been applied in practice.Because of the absence of legislation it makes the use of administrative law enforcement settlement the state of chaos in practice, which hinders the system to play apostive role.The meaning of settlement of adminstrative law enforcement system is that, during the praess of administrative enforcement, the administrative body can not sure about the fact or legal relationship which administrative decisions to be based on, or due to the high inusetigation costs, then it makes mutual concession with administrative counterparts and reach a written agreement in order to achieve administrative objectives. It differs from the mediation and the settlement in administrative litigation.The system of administrative law enforcement settlement embodies the moderm conmcept of deliberated democracy. It emphasizes the balance between fairness and efficieny, rule of law and essence of law, public and private interest. Scholars in U.S., Germany,Taiwan etc.exploes actively in settlement system.They stress the consensus in dispute resolution in both legislation and practice, which provides valuable expreience to build up our system of administrative law enforcement settlement.The system of administrative law enforcement in China has some fcasibility and realistic basis. To fulfill its function and resolving disputes, there should be regulations about its operation, principles, scope, procedures and supervision in legislation. Therefore, it will be better protect the interests of administrative counterparts, and prornote administrative loady administratives according to law and serves administrative, then adapt to the valua of social development goals.更多还原