【作者】 华心萌；

【导师】 陈勇强；

【作者基本信息】 天津大学 ， 管理科学与工程， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 建设工程替代性争议解决方式(ADR)与仲裁和诉讼相比在争议解决过程中具有多方面的优势,在国外得到越来越广泛的应用,在我国也已经开始推广为了我国建设工程ADR的发展,有必要对ADR的程序规则的制定进行研究。本文建设工程ADR的研究范围界定为有中间方参与的非终局性争议解决方式。首先介绍并总结了建设工程ADR的常用类型和共有优势,分析了其理论上的共有优势在实践中的实现面临着非合作博弈向合作博弈转化的问题,需要具有权威性的程序规则予以保证,并运用程序正义理论分析了建设工程ADR程序规则制定需要遵循的标准。然后选择国际工程合同范本最新版本的ADR程序规则,以及国际性争议解决机构适用于建设工程的调解和裁决等程序规则进行分类比较,分析其总体框架和各组成部分的共性、差异,以及编制原理。各份程序规则均体现了程序正义的标准,保证了建设工程ADR优势的发挥,但各自有着不同的特点和侧重,比较分析结果为实践中建设工程ADR程序规则的制定提供了充分的借鉴材料。进而在分析我国建设工程ADR的演变及国内外建设工程ADR理论与实践发展的基础上,提出完善争议评审机制是我国现阶段建设工程ADR发展的最为恰当的方式,并以比较分析的结果为基础,从程序规则的角度对争议评审机制的完善原则和完善策略提出建议。最后总结了本文的研究成果和需要进一步研究的问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 Compared with the arbitration and litigation, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has many advantages in the process of construction dispute settlement. For the development ADR of construction project in China, it is necessary to study the specific rules of ADR.Based on the introduction of the definition of ADR, the thesis defines the scope of the ADR research, which is the non-finality of dispute resolution with the middle-parties participating, and also analyzes the common types of ADR and its advantages. The problem of fulfilling the advantages of ADR of construction is the transformation of non-cooperative game to the cooperative game. The authoritative procedural rules are thus needed to ensure the fulfillment standards of establishing ADR procedure of construction are analyzed by using procedural justice theory. Then, rules of ADR procedure between the latest version of the contract for international construction project, and mediation and determination applicable to international dispute settlement body are compared and analyzed. The same and different points of the overall and individual parts are studied as well as the principle of preparing these documents. Various rules of procedure are to ensure the advantages of the ADR, but each has different characteristics and focuses. The result of the comparative analysis provides reference for the development of ADR rules of procedures in practice. Then, based on further analysis of the evolution of ADR in Chinese construction project and its theory and practice of ADR in the domestic and foreign construction projects, the dispute review mechanism is found to be the most appropriate ADR method. The suggestions about the principles and strategies for perfecting dispute review mechanism are proposed based on the comparative analysis. Finally, the research results and further research directions are summarized.更多还原