【作者】 邹莹；

【导师】 张兰馨；

【作者基本信息】 南昌大学 ， 刑法学， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 虚拟财产是伴随着网络游戏出现的新生事物,它的性质引起了法律理论界的关注,出现了是否为法律意义上的财产之争。它具有财产的三个属性：效用性、稀缺性、可支配性的,是属于玩家所有的一种具有价值的财产。在肯定了虚拟财产的法律地位后,刑法基于谦抑性原则和必要性应该对其进行保护。刑法并不是对所有的侵犯虚拟财产的行为进行规制,在进行介入的时候要把握现实性、适度性、积极性三个原则,在实际操作中也要考虑侵犯行为的目的和手段,以及是否是游戏规则允许之内的。国外以及我国大陆以外的地区将虚拟财产作为电磁记录进行保护,我国刑法关于虚拟财产的规定是一片空白,所以有必要进行立法和司法上的改革。明确虚拟财产在刑法中的地位和虚拟财产的价值确定标准,在盗窃罪中增加一条关于盗窃虚拟财产的罪状以及规定侵犯虚拟财产的犯罪为亲告罪。更多还原

【Abstract】 Virtual property is a new thing accompanied by emergence of online game. Its nature arouse the attention of legal theorists. There is a dispute about whether the virtual property has a legal meaning. The virtual property has three nature of the property which are utility, scarcity and availability. The virtual property is in legal owned by players. After affirming the legal status of the virtual property, it is necessary to protect the virtual property by criminal law based on the principle of Modesty and the need of criminal law protection. The criminal law do not regulate all the behavior of violation of the virtual property. We must grasp the principles of the reality, moderate and motivation before the intervention of criminal law and have to consider the purpose and means of the violations, and whether it is permitted within the rules of the games in practice. The countries protect the virtual property as magnetic recording in abroad and the areas outside China mainland. In China, there is few law about the virtual property, therefore there is a need for legislative and judicial reforms. We must clear the criminal status of virtual property and standard of values, add the behavior that violating the virtual property in the crime on stealing. The victim has a right of whether go to law.更多还原