【作者】 刘正东；

【导师】 庞凌；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 刑事司法解释是有权解释的主体在司法实践中对刑事法律和刑事诉讼法律的具体适用所做的解释。自1997年我国刑事诉讼法典和刑法典相继修订以来,我国又相继制定了上百部刑事司法解释,这些数量庞大的刑事司法解释对于在司法实践中正确适用刑法和刑事诉讼法起到了重要的推动作用。但我国的刑事司法解释体系存在着严重的缺陷,在制定主体、文本形式、解释内容等方面均需改进。本文作者结合自身工作实践,对我国刑事司法解释体系存在的缺陷进行分析,并提出建立新的刑事司法解释体系的构想,希望真正建立起以司法机关和司法工作人员为解释主体、解释权限明确、解释程序规范的刑事司法解释体系。更多还原

【Abstract】 The criminal judicial explanation refers to the explanation for interpreting the subject in judicial practice in criminal law and criminal procedure law, which is made by the subject of rights. Since 1997 when the Chinese Criminal Law and Chinese Criminal Procedure Law was revised, China has built up hundreds of criminal judicial explanation. These judicial explanation play the leading role in using the criminal law and criminal procedure law. But there are serious drawbacks in the system of criminal judicial explanation in Chinese. It needs improving in the main part, the formation of the material and the contents. Based on the author’s own practice, this thesis analyzed the drawbacks of the criminal judicial explanation system and put up an idea of building up a new system of the criminal judicial explanation. The author hopes to set up a system, which is to the judiciary and justice workers as the main, with clear rights of explanation and regular procedure of explanation.更多还原