节点文献

新课程背景下的高考语文试卷命题研究

The Chinese College Entrance Examination Research of the New Curriculum

【作者】 陈玉根

【导师】 郑桂华;

【作者基本信息】 华东师范大学 , 学科教学, 2009, 硕士

【摘要】 通过对新课程背景下的高考语文命题的研究,我们可以发现:新课程标准引领着命题方向,考试大纲规范着考试内容及试卷结构,由考试说明细化了命题形式。高考命题应重视发挥语文教材的作用,同时鼓励学生开展广泛的课外阅读。高考试题的命制过程有着严格的规范程序。语文考试学、教育测量学多方面的理论,为科学合理地评价语文高考试题提供了帮助。各省市单独命题,试卷结构形式各异,打破了全国卷一统天下的局面,试题题型不断创新。高考命题在选修内容的合理测试,主观题的评分误差,选择题的效度等方面仍存在不少问题,需要采取相应的对策。高考命题的研究对中学语文教学的启示不少,帮助学生了解解题思路并建立相应的解题模型。未来的高考更需要强调学生的能力测试,对学生的语文能力要构建多元评价体系,全面衡量学生的语文素养。

【Abstract】 Through the new curriculum in the context of the Chinese language entrance examination proposition study, we can find that the new curriculum standards lead the direction of the thesis and that the examination standards outline the content and the examination papers structure.The explanation about the examination outline details the form of propositions. College Entrance Examination proposition should pay attention to the role played by the language teaching materials, while encouraging students to engage in a wide range of extra-curricular reading. College Entrance Examination during the life of the system has a strictly regulated process.A wide range of theories of language examinations and education evaluation offers help for scientific and reasonable evaluation. Provincial and municipal separate propositions and different paper structures break the dominance of the national volume. All kinds of questions continue to innovate. There are many problems that still need to take corresponding countermeasures in the choice of the contents of a reasonable proposition testing and in subjective questions of the rating errors, such as the validity of multiple-choice questions.The study of secondary School entrance examination proposition gives language teaching and learning a lot of inspiration to help students understand the problem-solving ideas and establish the appropriate problem-solving model.Future college entrance examination needs the students to have the ability , but we must build multi-evaluation systems to evaluate the students’ language literacy.

  • 【分类号】G633.3
  • 【被引频次】31
  • 【下载频次】1482
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络