【作者】 孙秀芹；

【导师】 周长军；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 与传统的报应性司法截然不同,作为一种新型刑事司法模式,恢复性司法最重要的特征在于“恢复性”,不仅着眼于对被害人、对受到损害的社区的修复,而且注重对加害人自身的修复。就加害人保护而言,恢复性司法从一个全新的视角对犯罪以及加害人进行解读,努力探究如何保障加害人的合法权益,并使加害人真正悔过自新,顺利复归社会。论文以恢复性司法为切入点,分析了恢复性司法程序中的加害人权益保护,并实证考察了中国刑事和解对加害人权益保护的现状,进而提出构建完善中国的刑事和解制度,以完善加害人权益保护的建议。论文引言部分简要介绍论文的研究范围、研究现状、研究意义等基本概况。正文第一部分为恢复性司法的概述。该部分简要介绍了恢复性司法的涵义、特征、运作模式,阐述了恢复性司法产生的背景——被害人学理论的诞生和被害人权利运动的兴起以及对监狱矫正的反思和犯罪人复归社会理念的新发展。第二部分详细论述了加害人视角下恢复性司法的理论基础。具体包括恢复性正义理论、程序主体性理论、犯罪标签理论和重新融合性羞辱理论。第三部分系统分析了恢复性司法程序中的加害人权益保护。这部分详细阐述了恢复性司法程序对加害人权益的保护功能,包括:有助于改善加害人的认知,增强其承担责任的意识;尊重加害人的主体性,有助于加害人人格的转化;有利于加害人回归社区,实现再社会化;有利于矫正加害人,降低其再犯可能性。同时,恢复性司法程序中加害人权益保护也面临着一些挑战:既存在损害加害人正当利益的可能性,也存在姑息、放纵富裕加害人而侵害其他主体权益的风险。第四部分实证分析我国刑事和解对加害人权益保护的现状。该部分首先厘清了恢复性司法和刑事和解的关系。而后以加害人权益保护为中心分析我国刑事和解勃兴的动因。最后实证考察刑事和解中加害人权益保护的现状,阐释了刑事和解对加害人保护的积极价值和制度性隐忧。第五部分在上述研究分析的基础上,探讨如何构建完善我国刑事和解制度以完善加害人正当权益的保护。该部分首先明确应当使恢复性司法制度获得法律支撑,将其以法律明文规定的形式予以确立。然后在借鉴国外经验的基础上,提出了中国刑事和解制度的构建和完善。先阐述了刑事和解应坚持的原则,接着从适用范围、适用条件、适用阶段、具体程序等方面提出刑事和解的具体制度设计和完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 Restorative justice is different from the traditional retributive justice. As a new type of criminal justice model, the most important characteristic of restorative justice is "restorative", which not only focus on the restoration of the victim and damaged community, but also focus on the restoration of the offender. On the protection of the offender, restorative justice interprets the crime and the offender from a new perspective, strives to explore ways to protect the offender’s legitimate rights and interests, makes the offender truly repent and start anew, and makes him revert to the community smoothly. With restorative justice as the breakthrough point, this paper analyzes the protection of the offender’s rights and interests in restorative justice process, studies empirically the status quo of criminal reconciliation on protecting the offender’s rights and interests in China, and then puts forward the suggestions to build and improve criminal reconciliation system in China in order to improve the protection of the offender’s rights and interests.The introduction of the paper introduces briefly the basic profiles of the paper, such as research scope, research status and research meaning, etc.The first part of the body is an overview of restorative justice. The part introduces briefly the implication, characteristics and operation mode of restorative justice, and expounds the background of restorative justice - the birth of the theory of victimology and the rise of the victim’s rights movement as well as the reflection of prison correction and the new development of the concept of criminal’s reversion to the society.The second part discusses in detail theoretical basis of restorative justice under the perspective of the offender, including the theory of restorative justice, the theory of procedural subject, the labeling theory of crime and the theory of reintegrative shaming.The third part analyzes systematically the protection of the offender’s rights and interests in restorative justice process. This part elaborates on the protective functions of restorative justice process for the offender’s rights and interests, including: helping to improve cognition of the offender and to strengthen their sense of responsibility; respecting for the offender’s subjectivity, and contributing to the transformation of the offender’s personality; being conducive to the offender’s return to communities and his resocialization; being conducive to offender’s correction, reducing the possibility of their recidivism. At the same time, restorative justice process is also faced with some challenges in terms of the protection of the offender’s rights and interests. Restorative justice exists not only the possibility of damaging the offender’s legitimate interests, but also the risk of palliating and indulging affluent offender to infringe on other subjects’ interests.The fourth part analyzes empirically the status quo of criminal reconciliation on protecting the offender’s rights and interests in China. First of all, the part clarifies the relationship of restorative justice and criminal reconciliation. And then it analyzes the driving forces of the emergence of criminal reconciliation in China centering on the protection of the offender’s rights and interests. Finally, this part empirically studies the status quo of criminal reconciliation on protecting the offender’s rights and interests, illustrates the values and institutional problems of criminal reconciliation on protecting the offender.The fifth part which is based on the above-mentioned analysis explores ways to build and improve criminal reconciliation system in China in order to improve the protection of the offender’s legitimate rights and interests. The part makes clear firstly restorative justice should be established in the form of provisions of law. And then on the basis of learning from foreign experiences, it proposes the concrete construction and perfection of criminal reconciliation system in China. It firstly expounds the principles criminal reconciliation should be adhered to, and then puts forward the specific design and perfection of criminal reconciliation system from the aspects such as applicable scope, applicable conditions, applicable stages, specific procedures and so on.更多还原