节点文献
正当持票人规则在信用证下的重构
Reconstruction of the Rule of Holder in Due Course under Letters of Credit
【作者】 李露;
【导师】 李国安;
【作者基本信息】 厦门大学 , 国际法学, 2008, 硕士
【摘要】 信用证交易中正当持票人的权益保护在各国司法实践中的表现不一已是不争的事实。一方面,各国的票据法对于正当持票人的规定差异甚大,尤其是日内瓦票据法系和英美票据法系,由于迥异的法律传统和制度设置,加上特定的社会历史条件,两大票据法系的矛盾至今无法调和;另一方面,将原属票据法的正当持票人规则直接适用于发源于国际银行实务的信用证交易也是困难重重。要解决上述矛盾,就需要重新审视信用证机制下正当持票人的构成要件,将合理的国际实务规则适当地引入国内票据法原理之中,在防止欺诈与鼓励诚信交易以及融资银行对信用证义务独立性的依赖之间保持正确的平衡。本文第一章回顾了问题产生的渊源。通过对比新的《跟单信用证统一惯例》(UCP600)与UCP500之中关于保护善意持票人的相关规定后指出,UCP600将保护善意的信用证关系参加人问题留给国内法处理的做法,更突显出正当持票人身份的重要性。第二章梳理了两大票据法系中关于正当持票人的规定。虽然在立法目的和司法思维上有显著差异,但两大法系均直接或间接地对票据交易过程中的善意持票人进行了保护。第三章分析了现有关于信用证项下正当持票人保护的司法实践和对其毁誉参半的学术理论。在不同的法系中,他们展示出完全相异的图景。第四章从功能主义出发,通过对经典案例的分析,试图寻求国内票据法的强制性规定和国际商业惯例之间的平衡,从而构建出信用证制度中关于正当持票人的特殊保护规则。第五章论述了上述理论对中国法律的实践意义,为未来相关司法解释的修改提供可资借鉴的思路。
【Abstract】 It is undisputable that the protection of the holder in due course in letters of credit transaction shows very different pictures in different countries. On one hand, different Negotiation Instrument Laws have different doctrines on the holder in due course, and it is almost impossible to have a common definition among countries especially between the Geneva Convention system and the Common law system because of their distinct legal traditions and systems. On the other hand, it is also very difficult to apply the holder in due course doctrine in letter of credit transaction directly. Therefore, in order to keep balance between dealing in good faith and the reliance on the independency of letters of credit, it is time to review the elements of holder in due course under letters of credit transaction.Chapter 1 compared the rules for holder in good faith in UCP 600 and UCP 500. The holder in due course is more significant in the international letter of credit system because the new UCP600 leaves the issue of protecting bona fide participators to the national law.Chapter 2 introduces the rule of holder in due course in the Geneva Convention system and the Common law system, which protect the holder in due course in different ways.Chapter 3 analyses the distinct pictures of legal practice and academic theories on the protection of holder in due course.Chapter 4 is case study. The special rule for the holder in due course under the letter of credit should be reconstructed on the balance of the restriction of national laws and the international business practice.Chapter 5 is the study of the above theory in Chinese context, so as to provide an appropriate approach to our legal reform on the relevant Judicial Interpretations.
- 【网络出版投稿人】 厦门大学 【网络出版年期】2009年 08期
- 【分类号】D996.2;D922.287
- 【被引频次】4
- 【下载频次】99