【作者】 王真千；

【导师】 谭晶荣；

【作者基本信息】 浙江工业大学 ， 国际贸易学， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 中日韩三国有着相近的地理位置,相似的生活消费习惯,三国互为彼此的重要贸易对象国。但是三国农产品贸易与其他产业贸易相比发展缓慢,贸易规模小,在建立中日韩FTA进程中,中日韩三国农业部门各自较难与其他两国达成自由贸易协议。本文通过分析三国的农产品贸易状况的全面分析,探索三国农产品贸易进一步合作的可能性。本文首先对中日韩三国农业发展基本情况,农业政策等进行介绍,指出三国农产品贸易的国内限制因素,其次通过农产品RCA指数,在美国市场的相似度指数,RTA指数的测算,得出三国水产品均具有比较优势,中国在园艺类产品上具有更大的比较优势,韩日两国林产品更具有比较优势。总体上,韩日两国的农产品的竞争性大于中日两国和中韩两国农产品的竞争性。再次,通过OBC指数,I_ij指数的计算,得出三国各自对另外两国农产品出口的具有互补性且对本国来说具有竞争优势的产品。通过产业内产业间贸易指数的计算得出,韩日两国总体农产品产业内贸易指数较高,但产业内贸易状况并非最好。中日两国总体产业内贸易指数低于中韩和日韩,但在某些特定农产品占进出口比重较大的产品上产业内贸易指数较高。中韩两国虽然总体产业内贸易水平不高,但有13种特定农产品产业内贸易指数高于0.5,属于产业内贸易占优势的状况。整体来说三国农产品以资源禀赋为基础的产业间贸易占优势,三国相互之间农产品互补性较强。研究结果表明在三国相互贸易中,日本在各类农产品上比较优势发挥比较充分,而中、韩两国仍有较大发展空间。更多还原

【Abstract】 The three countries China, Japan and Republic of Korea has the same geographic location, similar consumption custom, they are important trading partners one another. But compare with other industries, the development of agricultural products trading is slower, and also the volume is much smaller. In the process of establishing China-Japan-Korea FTA, it is the three countries’ agricultural department that each cannot easily obtain free-trade-agreement with the other two. This situation does a lot with the condition of each country’s economy development, land resource and agricultural policy etc. This article wants to search the possibility of further cooperation of the three countries by analysis the trading condition of their agricultural products.This article firstly, showing the basic condition of agricultural development and agricultural policy of each country to point out the trading restriction from domestic facts. Then by calculation of RCA index, similarity index in American market and RTA index of the three countries’ agricultural products, we find out products that a country has comparative advantage, or products countries competing fiercely. Of all the agricultural products, the three countries all have comparative advantage in aquatic products and China has more advantage on horticultural products while the other two have more advantage on forest products. Generally speaking, the competition of agricultural products between Japan and Korea is fiercer than the competition between China and Korea or China and Japan.Also, by the calculation of OBC index, I_ij index, we find products that one country have comparative advantage and also as a complement product on the country market. There are many such kinds of products we don’t show them here. In the research of complementarity, we also calculated the intra-industry trade index and inter-industry trade index of the three countries. Japan-Korea intra-industry trade index is a little higher but still it is not the best condition we can find. The China-Japan total intra-industry index is lower than China-Korea and Japan-Korea, but some special products that take big rate in trading have high intra-industry index. Although China-Korea haven’t high intra-industry index, they have 13 kinds of agricultural products with intra-industry index higher than 0.5, means that these 13 products have more advantage on intra-industry trading. Genially speaking, the main form of three countries bilateral agricultural products trade is the inter-industry trade based on the difference of resource endowment the complementarity of agricultural products in the three countries is comparatively strong.The research shows that, in the bilateral trading between China, Japan and Korea, Japan has give full play to the comparative advantage she have on agricultural products, and the other countries’ still have a big development space.更多还原