【作者】 王嘉伟；

【导师】 李霞；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 无效合同的确认和财产的处理是合同法理论及司法实践中的重要问题,也是难点。尽管我国民法通则、合同法对无效合同作了规定,但对待一些具体问题,司法实践中仍存在不同的认识和做法。如今,我国学者对无效合同制度的研究虽多,但对于具体问题和细节问题则缺少研究和阐述。本文结合我国现行立法规定,注重搜集司法实践中的实例,并参考国外立法、法理和判例,对实务中的几个重点问题提出观点和见解,以期对我国无效合同制度有关理论的进一步研究与完善有所裨益,并有利于更好地指导审判实践。全文分为六节。第一节是对无效合同制度的概述。简要介绍了无效合同相关概念。无效合同制度的法理基础和历史发展。第二节是对无效合同的法定情形作了探讨。本节主要是根据现行立法规定,详细阐述了认定无效合同的法律依据,同时提出了正确认定合同无效所应坚持的两个原则。第三节研究了无效合同的法律后果。这一节是本文的重点。介绍了国外两大法系在无效合同的处理上的做法。明确了无效合同的首要法律后果,指出了司法实践中对此问题的忽视。其次,结合我国现行立法,通过比较,详细阐述了对无效合同法律后果的具体应用。第四节研究了无效合同的补正与效力转换问题。结合最高人民法院的司法解释,笔者对无效合同的补正与效力转换问题进行了初步的研究。第五节论述了无效合同的诉讼主体。论证了任何人都可作为无效合同的诉讼主体的观点不妥,对合理的范围提出了自己的观点。同时指出,应限制有过错的合同当事人主张合同无效的权利。第六节论述了无效合同的诉讼时效问题。无效合同的确认不应适用诉讼时效;但对无效合同法律后果的处理则要具体分析,笔者试图提出了一定的标准。最后是结语部分。对本文中的观点作了总结。更多还原

【Abstract】 The affirmation and legal consequence of void contract is an important issue in both theory and judicial practice,also a difficult issue. Though there are principle provisions in the General principles of Civil Law and in the Contract Law concerning the issue,we see different in our understanding and judicial practice. Now ,our scholars have many books and papers on this issue.However,they pay little attention to concrete problem and detail issue. According to the current legislative systems,collecting real case,referring to and analying the law,the theory and judicial precedent in countries around the world,my paper puts forward the view and opinion to several key problems in the practice so as to be instructive and helpful to civil and judicial practice.The whole thesis is composed of six sections.The first section is a summary to the system of the void contract. It introduces the concept and the history of the void contract briefly and why the system of the void contract exists in the law.Section two asserting the standard to the void contract. It combines the current legislation of our country,has explained in detail that asserts the legal basis of the void contract, and has pointed out that we should insist on two principles.Section three studies the legal consequence of the void contract. This section is the focus of this paper. I first expound the legal effect of the void contract on the significance, pointing out that the judicial practice of ignoring the issue. Secondly, the combination of our existing legislation, and introduce two foreign law systems, by comparison, elaborate the specific application on the legal consequence of the void contract.Section four is on an void contract to make corrections and effectiveness of the conversion issue. According to the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court, I have a preliminary study to make corrections and effectiveness of the conversion issueSection five discusses the subject of the void contract of the argumentation. It proves that anyone can advocate the void contract as the main point of view is wrong , the reasonable scope of their views. At the same time that there should be restrictions on the parties to a contract fault that the right to the void contract.Section six discusses the lawsuit prescroption question of the void contract. The confirmation of the void contract should not suit the lawsuit prescroption , but the legal consequences of the void contract will have to deal with specific analysis, the author tried to put a certain standard.Concludes the speech finally, I do the summary to the view originally in the article.更多还原