【作者】 周鹏涛；

【导师】 牟宪魁；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 买卖不破租赁制度是指租赁关系存续期间,租赁物交付于承租人后,出租人又将租赁物所有权让与第三人,而使原来的租赁关系继续对买受人有效的一种法律制度。该制度自产生以来颇受争议,同时又不断向前发展。我国《合同法》第229条规定:租赁物在租赁期间发生所有权变动的,不影响租赁合同的效力。即在租赁合同存续期间,租赁物因买卖、赠与等原因行为发生所有权变动的,原租赁合同继续有效,承租人的租赁权可以对抗受让人的所有权。传统民法理论认为,所有权属于物权,承租权属于债权。伴随着社会经济的高速发展,以及市场经济主体活动的复杂化,物权与债权的界限越来越难以划分,两者出现了互相交融的趋势。但是,我国目前的买卖不破租赁制度规定较为简单,操作性较差,不能满足司法实践的需要。首先,本文从该制度的内涵入手,界定租赁物所有权发生移转的原因不再局限于传统的买卖行为,然后进一步从其历史发展过程、国内外的立法比较等多方面进行阐述,以此来说明买卖不破租赁制度在不断发展不断完善。第二部分是对买卖不破租赁原则适用要件的介绍,通过比较分析,阐述各种学说在适用要件上的不同观点不同要求。笔者赞同三要件说,即须存在合法有效的租赁合同;租赁物已被交付且处于占有状态;租赁物所有权被让与第三人。第三部分着重分析买卖不破租赁原则适用后所产生的法律效果,即出租人、承租人、受让人三方之间的法律关系以及各方权利义务上的不同,以便于实践当中更好的运用该原则处理法律实务问题。第四部分重点论述了买卖不破租赁原则类推适用的两种情形,即司法实践中经常涉及的问题,抵押权和租赁权冲突时如何适用该原则的问题以及执行权和租赁权冲突时如何适用该原则的问题。最后是关于我国立法的几点思考意见,指出目前我国立法的几点不足,同时针对我国的买卖不破租赁制度提出了几条具体的立法建议,以期完善我国的买卖不破租赁制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 Not breaking the sale of lease system means during the time of leasing, after the leasehold is delivered to the lessee, lessor deliver the ownership to a third person, but the original lease is still effective to the bargainee. This system has generated controversy since it is created, meanwhile it has developed constantly. China’s "Contract Law" of the 229th: leasing of the lease during the ownership change will not affect the validity of the lease agreement. That is, in the leasing contracts during the time, due to the sale of rental, gifts and other acts of the reasons for the change in ownership. Original leasing contract remain in force, the tenant can lease the right to fight against the assignee of ownership. The traditional theory that the Civil Code, ownership of property rights, leasing the right to belong to creditors. Along with the rapid socio-economic development and market economy the main activities of the complexity of property rights and claims more and more difficult to define the limits of both a mutual integration trend. However, China’s current trading system is not broken lease provides a relatively simple, workable poor and can not meet the needs of judicial practice.First of all, this paper from the system starting with the connotation, defining lease of the reasons for the transfer of ownership is no longer confined to traditional trading behavior, and then further from its course of historical development, domestic and international legislation on a comparison of various aspects in order to That the sale of rental system is not broken in the continuous development of continuous improvement.The second part of the sale of non-breaking application of the principle elements of the lease, through a comparative analysis on various elements of doctrine in the application of the different views on different requirements. I agree that the three elements that must exist valid lease contract; leasehold has been in the possession and delivery status of leasehold title with a third person to be. The third part will focus on analyzing the sale of not breaking the lease after the application of the principle of the legal effect, that is the lessor, lessee, the assignee constituents and the legal relationship between the parties on the different rights and obligations in order to facilitate better use of practice The principle of substantive legal issues.Part IV focuses on the sale of lease does not break the principle of analogy applies both cases, the judicial practice often involved in the issue, mortgage and leasing rights conflict with the application of the principles of the problem and the implementation of the right to lease the right to the conflict and how to apply the matter of principle.Finally, on China’s Legislative Reflections on the view that China’s lack of legislative points, while for China’s trading system is not broken by the leasing of several specific legislative proposals with a view to improving China’s trading system is not broken lease.更多还原