【作者】 周晓静；

【导师】 王克稳；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 宪法与行政法， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 我国《行政诉讼法》明文规定了“行政诉讼不适用调解”原则,并且对行政机关与公民的和解也未作规定,然而实践中和解普遍存在。我们认为在行政诉讼中禁止调解,不能适应现代行政法发展的需要。行政诉讼和解作为一种合意式解决争议、协调官民矛盾的纠纷解决机制,契合构建和谐社会的政策理念,在行政诉讼中推行和解制度,具有必要性和可行性。基于此,本文从行政诉讼和解制度的涵义入手,讨论行政诉讼和解制度的必要性、可行性以及条件和范围,最后从原则、程序和限制的角度,对行政诉讼和解制度的实际运行进行了探讨。更多还原

【Abstract】 The administrative litigation act of the People’s Republic of China expressly prescribes that“mediation shall not apply to administrative litigation,”and no provision is made about settlement between a state organ and citizens,but settlement widely exists in practice.As a kind of consensual mechanisn of dispute settlement,the reconciliation in administrative litigation is good at solving contradictions and coordinating problems between government and citizens,which is fit the harmonious society policy.It is legitimate and necessary to implement reconciliation in administrative litigation.Basing on above reasoning, this article starts from introducing the concept of the reconciliation in administrative litigation, and then discusses the necessary, feasibility, condition and scope of the reconciliation in administrative litigation. Finally, a further study about implementation of the reconciliation in administrative litigation also is made in this paper from principle, procedure and limitation perspective view.更多还原