【作者】 姜振国；

【导师】 曹博；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 本文从检察机关提请抗诉并获法院再审改判的案例说起,提出在理论上如何理解和认定买卖不破租赁规则,在司法实践中如何正确运用此规则等一系列疑问。带着这些问题本文首先阐述了买卖不破租赁规则产生的理论基础,然后从德、日等国及我国台湾地区的立法规定中归纳出买卖不破租赁规则的适用要件,并对适用这些要件应注意的一些问题进行了讨论,提出自己的观点。然后文章归纳分析了租期内租赁物所有权变动的效力。在借鉴国外和我国台湾立法的基础上,文章对我国合同法第229条规定进行反思指出我国合同法的规定存在五个方面的不足,即:在租赁物的范围上包括动产有失妥当;未以承租人受让租赁物的交付并占有租赁物为要件不利于交易安全;以租赁期间所有权变动为买卖不破租赁规则适用的要件,而没有加以任何限制,失之过泛;缺乏准用性规定;效力规定不完整等,并提出相应的完善建议。最后结合本文具体案例对司法机关再审改判此案作了法理上的阐释并对司法实践中应予以关注的问题进行了探讨。更多还原

【Abstract】 This article brought to the appeal from the prosecution and the court commuted retrial of the case begins, in theory, put forward on how to understand and that is not the sale of lease-breaking rules, judicial practice in the proper use of this rule and a series of questions. With these questions in this paper elaborated on the sale of lease-breaking rules do not have a theoretical basis, and then from Germany and Japan, countries such as China and Taiwan, the legislative provisions into a sale lease-breaking rules do not apply to the elements, and the application of these elements should be noted Some of the issues discussed and put forward their views. The article then summarized the analysis of the rent during the lease-ownership changes in effect. In China’s Taiwan and foreign legislation on the basis of Article 229 of China’s Contract Law stipulates that reflect China’s Contract Law provides that the existence of less than five aspects, namely: the leasehold on the scope of the property, including being properly; not In order to transfer the lessee’s lease-hold tenancy and delivery of materials for the elements of the transaction is not conducive to security; change in ownership during the lease to not break the lease sale rule applies to the elements, and does not impose any restriction, loss of the Pan-off; the lack of Permitted provisions; the effectiveness of the provisions, such as incomplete, and propose recommendations to improve. Finally, the specific case of the judiciary in this article retrial of this case was made for revision of the legal interpretation and judicial practice should be of concern were discussed.更多还原