【作者】 刘根乐；

【导师】 丁文英；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 民商法学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 本文简要说明了触电的原因、种类和方式,分析了触电人身损害的法律属性并对触电人身损害进行了分类。低电压触电人身损害属于一般侵权行为,应适用侵权法的一般规定;高电压触电人身损害属于高度危险作业,是典型的特殊侵权行为,应适用侵权法的特别规定。《民法通则》、《电力法》等不同的法律,由于其所规范的法律关系不同,对触电人身损害赔偿有不同的规定,造成理解和适用法律的困难。多数国家对高度危险作业的责任都规定了无过错责任原则或与其内涵一致的归责原则。但适用无过错责任并非不考虑过错,而是不考虑行为人的过错,但应考虑第三人过错和受害人的原因。受害人的故意是适用无过错责任的免责事由,但不可抗力的免责应该受到限制,同时当第三人和受害人的重大过失行为等“外在原因”与触电损害后果的发生有因果关系时,应当减轻电力作业人的责任,适用无过错责任时在符合一定条件的情况下可以适用“过失相抵”原则。在触电人身损害赔偿案件的法律适用中,应当区分不同责任主体,准确把握《民法通则》第123条蕴涵的立法精神,从而正确适用相应的法律规定,确保使受害人能够公平、及时地得到救济。建议对有关法律法规进行相应的完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 This article briefly illustrates the reason, category and type about electric shock as well analyses law property about personal injury due to electric shock and categorises. The personal injury about low voltage electric shock belongs to common infringement act that should be adapted to the general rules of tort low; meanwhile the personal injury about high voltage electric shock belongs to special infringement act as it is highly dangerous operation, so it should be adapted to the special terms on tort law. Different compensation principle according to The Civil Law and The Electricity Law about personal injury due to electric shock leads to difficulties on how to comprehend and adapt to law, because these two laws have different adapted ranges. Most countries provides non-fault principle or same as liability in contexts for the highly dangerous operation, but to practice the non-fault duty does not mean neglecting the fault duty, but the duty of the actor whereas the fault of the third person and the victim should be emphasized. The excusatio for non-fault principle adapts to the victim’s purposed behavior but the force majeure exemption from liability should be limited, meanwhile when there happens cause-effect between extrinsic cause i.e. culpa late of the third person and victim and the consequence of electric shock. The liability of electronically operators ought to be release, the negligence offset principle can be adapt to non-fault principle under set condition. In the law of touching the personal compensation for damage case is applicable to, should distinguish different duty bearer, hold the legislative spirit that the item 123 in The Civil Law contains accurately. This ensure victim can gain remedies fairly and promptly. Suggestion to perfect relevant legislation.更多还原