【作者】 尹小荣；

【导师】 关今华；

【作者基本信息】 福建师范大学 ， 马克思主义理论与思想政治教育， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 在20世纪末,也是国际社会全球化进程不断加快的时期,整个国际社会的国际私法越来越受到各方面的重视。我国国际私法整体水平在整个法学研究领域中取得了非常醒目的提高和进步。然而,我国的婚姻家庭领域却一直少有关注。尤其是涉外夫妻财产问题,除了教材的基础性阐述之外,至今仍没有系统深入的专门研究。因此,笔者概括、汇总出目前国内外婚姻立法的最新发展趋势,指出我国的实践困境以及出路,并对我国立法的重构大胆提出了若干具体设计,以求对我国将来的涉外夫妻财产立法及实践有所帮助。笔者提出目前各国关于涉外夫妻财产法律适用问题的重大分歧主要体现在当事人属人法连结点的选择,动产不动产的分割制还是统一制的取舍,准据法适用的变迁还是恒定以及意思自治适用的范围等方面。针对这四点,本文结合各国冲突法的发展趋势,以灵活性与明确性为价值取向对我国涉外夫妻财产法律提出建议:我国未来的涉外夫妻财产属人法应以住所地为连结点;无论动产还是不动产都应采取统一的规则;结合财产的密切关系原则应赋予准据法以变迁性;意思自治原则在内容上应限制在与财产有关联,在形式上除了明示之外,还应增加默示的方式。更多还原

【Abstract】 Till the end of the last century, also the dramatically accelerating period of international globalization, private international law has been attached great importance in various respects by the world. The overall research of China’s private international law has also got striking progress and advancement. However, the field of cross-border marriage and family relations is still standing in the dark corner, especially in perspective of matrimonial property relating foreign elements. Apart from the basic statement in textbooks, there is scarcely systematical special research into it. So the author summarizes and concludes the latest developing trend of marriage legislation, either domestic or abroad, points out China’s practical dilemma and the way-out to it. She also proposes some specific design of reconstructing our legislation, in hoping for favoring the matrimonial property legislation and practice.As far as the author is concerned, the greatest differences in law application between various counties existing in four perspectives: the law being designated according to spouse’s nationality or habitual residence; movable and immovable property being subject to the same or different law; the law pursuant to being permanently the original one or flexible into another and the range of express stipulation. According to above mentioned and the developing trend in conflicts of law over the world, the author values great flexibility and clarity and gives her advice as following: the future matrimonial property relations with foreign elements shall be pursuant to the law of common habitual residence; there shall be the same rules for both property movable and immovable; integrating with the principle of close relation the law shall be flexible; express stipulation shall be limited in closely related to property and it is also valid in the form of implication.更多还原