论我国刑事侦查程序中的隐私权保护

【作者】 钟秋；

【导师】 杨开湘；

【作者基本信息】 中南大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 社会文明的发展要求对隐私权提供更为充分的保护,刑事侦查程序在维护公益限制公民权利的同时也应加强对隐私权的保护,但在我国现行刑事诉讼立法中,法律对侦查程序的制约是相对欠缺的。侦查程序中公民的基本权利,尤其是隐私权这一新兴的、外来的权利在现行立法中没有得到应有的体现,从而在司法实践中难以得到有效保障。侦查实践中的强制性措施,比如搜查、扣押、监听、监视、强制取样和讯问等侦查行为都可能严重侵犯犯罪嫌疑人的隐私权。与国外相关制度进行比较,可以发现,一些国家对于侦查程序的立法相对完备,对侦查程序中的强制措施更是加以严格限制,这其中对隐私权的保护也可谓细致周全。因此,我国侦查程序中对隐私权的保护还有待完善,此一领域的立法必须从三个方面入手:隐私权保护规范的细则化;侦查人员违法制裁制度;侦查程序受害者权利救济体制。更多还原

【Abstract】 It made a claim for higher demand to protect right to privacy with the development of civilization.The criminal investigation procedure although could limit people’s right for the public interest but also should strengthen the protection to right to privacy. But it is comparatively short of restrict to criminal investigation procedure in our present criminal procedure law. In investigation procedure, citizens’ fundamental rights, especially the right to privacy which is new and external, are not representing in our present law. So it is hard to be protected effectively in juridical practice. The enforcement arrangements, such as search、distrain、monitor、surveillance、compulsive sampling and inquest may impinge on suspect’s right to privacy in investigation practice. Compared with foreign related system, we find that the legislation about criminal investigation procedure is mature and have more restricts to enforcement arrangements in some countries. They protect the right to privacy more particularity. So we should do something to perfect the system of protecting to right to privacy in criminal investigation procedure such as make our rules more detailed, crack down on investigator who disobey the rule and redress the victims in procedure.更多还原