【作者】 冯冰；

【导师】 康建辉；

【作者基本信息】 西安理工大学 ， 马克思主义基本原理， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 《中华人民共和国反垄断法》已通过,但是由于反垄断法中并没有具体的知识产权方面相关规定,所以知识产权领域反垄断的立法工作依然任重道远。从各国的审判实践和我国的具体情况可以看出,在当今激烈的国际科技、经济竞争中,许多国外大企业在我国市场上的垄断行为都同知识产权的不正当行使分不开,因此建立与知识产权有关的反垄断法律制度对于保护我国经济的健康发展和经济安全具有重要的意义。我国应当如何进行立法,采用什么样的方式对知识产权领域的垄断行为进行规制是一个紧迫的问题。作为发展中国家的中国,一方面必须积极应对发达国家保护知识产权的要求,另一方面国内许多行业的发展又受到发达国家对知识产权垄断的限制。如何在尊重知识产权的基础上对知识产权垄断进行规制,以维护自身利益,都对法律制度提出了新的更高的要求,这也是本文研究的现实意义所在。本文在介绍知识产权、垄断概念的基础上,对知识产权、反垄断的理论基础、特征、地位及意义等基本理论问题进行了阐述。论述了知识产权与反垄断法的相互关系。知识产权是私权,赋予其专有权保护具有合理性。知识产权“外部性”问题的存在,使得知识产权法律制度的理性设计,需要对知识产权专有权加以必要的限制,以维护权利人与社会公众利益的平衡。知识产权许可通常是有利于竞争与创新的。但知识产权许可时,权利人可能会滥用知识产权,垄断或企图非法维持垄断,损害竞争和创新。反垄断法对知识产权滥用的规制有利于维护竞争、创新和社会公众利益。本文根据我国面临的实际情况,分析了企业滥用知识产权取得垄断地位问题;研究了各种滥用知识产权取得垄断地位的形式;对相关的产品和服务市场加以分析,得出了拥有知识产权本身并不等于取得垄断地位,而如果滥用知识产权限制了竞争,形成垄断则是非法的结论;提出了完善我国知识产权的相关立法,并在适当条件下制定一部适合我国国情的知识产权反垄断法的建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 "People’s Republic of China Anti-monopoly Law" adopted at August 30, 2007, there is still a long way to go regarding anti-monopoly legislation in the field of intellectual property, due to the fact that there are no well established rales and regulations in this regard. It can be seen from the judgment fulfillment of all countries and the concrete circumstance of our country that, under the intensive international competition of science and economy nowadays, the monopoly of many foreign enterprises in our domestic market is closely related with their ill-implementation of intellectual property. Therefore, in order to protect the development and safety of China’s economy, it is of essential importance to establish anti-monopoly rales and regulations concerning intellectual property, while the instant problem would be how to do that. As a developing country, China, on one hand, has to face the repeating requests of developed countries to make effective protection of intellectual property. On the other hand many local developments of professions are again subjected to the restriction that the flourishing nation breaks to the intelligent property right Long. How to regulate the abuse of intellectual property on the basis of a respect for intellectual property, so as to protect China’s own interest, poses a new question to the current legal system, and is what the present research is trying to provide an answer to.The present paper expatiates on the theoretical foundation, features and meaning of intellectual property and anti-monopoly on the basis of basic legal concepts, and discusses the relationship between intellectual property and anti-monopoly law. The intelligent property right is a private power, which justifies the rationality of its exclusive right protection. The existence of problem in "exterior" of the intelligent property right, make the system reasonableness of the intelligent property right law design, need to take into necessary restriction to support right person and the balance of social public benefits to the intelligent property right exclusive right. Intellectual property permission is most of the time beneficial for competition and innovation, yet property owner may abuse their power, to monopolize or attempt to illegally keep monopoly of the intellectual property, thus impairing competition and innovation. The restriction that anti-monopoly law sets on intellectual property is propitious to the maintenance of competition, innovation and public interest. This paper analyses the issue that some enterprises abuse intellectual property to achieve monopoly in view of the current situation in China, and researches into different methods that these enterprises adopt in doing so. Moreover, the paper analyzes relevant product and service markets and draws a conclusion that owning intellectual property is not equivalent to gaining monopoly, yet abuse of intellectual property which hinders competition and contributes to monopoly is illegal. Finally, suggestion is made that the current intellectual property legislation should be perfected and an anti-monopoly law of intellectual property should be made which fits the current situation of China.更多还原