公力救济与私力救济的法理差异与互补

【作者】 陶然；

【导师】 眭鸿明；

【作者基本信息】 南京师范大学 ， 法学理论， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 长久以来,随着法律至高无上理念的广泛传播,通过公力救济来解决纠纷、实现正义似乎成了唯一正统的途径。而私力救济一直被视为落后、不文明和应抑制的现象。尽管有着对私力救济的种种偏见与限制,然而私力救济却从未在人类历史发展的长河中消失过。随着社会的发展,私力救济再次兴起,在纠纷的解决过程中扮演着日益重要的角色。该文从法理学的角度对公力救济与私力救济的异同进行比较、分析,联系我国现状,以求完善我国权利救济体系。该文共分为三个部分:第一部分是对公力救济与私力救济的概述,主要对公力救济与私力救济的一些基本理论问题进行梳理和分析,包括权利救济的一般理论、历史发展以及公力救济与私力救济的一般特性,为下文分析二者的法理差异与互补打下理论基础。第二部分是公力救济与私力救济的法理价值的差异与互补分析,先交代二者共同的法理基础,然后从正义、秩序、效益、和自由四个方面对公力救济与私力救济的法理价值差异进行比较分析,最后从二者救济路径的角度谈他们之间的互补性问题。第三部分在分析影响权利救济方法选择的因素的基础之上,结合我国权利救济体系现状,寻求完善我国权利救济的新途径。更多还原

【Abstract】 Over the years, the concept of the primacy of law with widespread relief of the public to resolve disputes, the achievement of justice seems to be the only legitimate way. And private relief force has been seen as backward, uncivilized phenomenon and should be suppressed. Despite the private relief of all kinds of prejudices and limitations, but had never disappeared in the history. With the development of society, private relief rising again and playing an increasingly important role in the dispute settlement process. This article of jurisprudence from the perspective of public and private relief of the similarities and differences of relief for comparison, analysis, contact our country’s actual conditions, in order to improve the rights of China’s relief system.This article is divided into three parts:Chapter 1,generally instroduct the public and private relief and relief of an overview of the major relief to public and private relief of some of the basic theoretical issues should be straightened out and analysis, including rights of the general theory of relief, the historiy development of public and private relief of relief The general characteristics of the two below the legal differences and complementarity lay a theoretical basis.Chapter 2, instroduct the differences and complementarity of the two first account of the common legal basis, then justice, order, efficiency, and freedom of the four aspects of public and private relief of relief The jurisprudence differences between the value of a comparative analysis .Finally, it is about the two relief path from the perspective of the complementarity between them on issues.Chapter 3, on the basis of analysing the influencing of the choice of the right methodology relief on the basis of factors, in light of China’s right to relief system status, in search to perfect relief right to a new way.更多还原