【作者】 王珺；

【导师】 欧福永；

【作者基本信息】 湖南师范大学 ， 国际法学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 禁诉令在国际商事仲裁中的运用非常广泛。英美法系国家和少数大陆法系国家的法院经常应当事人的申请,签发禁诉令来干预仲裁程序或抵制执行仲裁裁决,以对抗挑选法院和平行诉讼,争取本国的民商事管辖权。国际商事仲裁中的禁诉令制度在司法实践中备受争议,最主要的原因是它在某种程度上干涉了外国的司法主权和违背了国际仲裁的基本原则。类似的案例层出不穷,我国的法院和当事人在国际民事诉讼中亦利用或遭受过外国的禁诉令,但对此国内外相关的研究还十分有限,这不利于保护本国国家和公民的合法权利。解决这一问题,需从实体法和程序法两方面出发,建立相关的国际商事仲裁中的禁诉令制度,以促进我国国际贸易的发展。文章结合1958年《关于承认和执行外国仲裁裁决公约》、1965年《解决国家与他国国民间投资争端公约》、《维也纳条约法公约》及《联合国国际贸易法委员会国际商事仲裁示范法》等相关国际公约以及PhillipAlexander Securities案、KBC v.Pertamina案、Loewen案、AngelicGrace案、Welex案和Himpurna California Energy v.Indonesia案等案例,并主要从不同的禁诉令签发主体(如内国法院、仲裁员、国际投资争端解决中心等)出发,来讲述国际商事仲裁的禁诉令制度。并对我国相关制度的完善提出建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 Nowadays, Anti-suit injunction is widely used in international commercial arbitration. Courts in many common law as well as some civil law countries frequently resort to this device at a party’ s request in order to disrupt the arbitration process, to resist the enforcement of the award, or to resist forum shopping and parallel proceedings, and at last get its jurisdiction.The use of anti-suit injunctions in the context of international commercial arbitration has raised many disputes. The main problem is that it appears to violate the accepted principles of international arbitration and denial of justice to some extent. There are many such cases and they can be bothersome for the courts and for the parties in international commercial arbitration, but there is less research on this subject. So this is harmful to the states and civil legal rights.In order to resolve these problems and promote the development of international trade, we need to try on combining procedural law with substantive law, and setting up related legal system. This article introduce the Convention of the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards 1958, Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between State and National of other States 1965, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation and other related conventions. In addition, this article explain the Phillip Alexander Securities case, KBC v. Pertamina case, Loewen case, Angelic Grace case, Welex case, Himpurna California Energy v. Indonesia case and so on. At the same time, it mainly introduces the anti-suit injunctions issued by different organs (e. g. national courts, arbitrator, ICSID). For this reason, in order to bring forward rational proposal to perfect our law, the author raises her opinions and the views.更多还原