【作者】 罗薇；

【导师】 郑远民；

【作者基本信息】 湖南师范大学 ， 民商法学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 在当今频繁的经济交往和经济流转中,由于各种原因,无可避免地会发生登记权利和真实权利不一致的情形,也就是不正确登记。在物权采取公信原则的立法中,对于不正确登记,法律仍然承认其具有与真实的物权相同的法律效果。真正权利人的权利受到侵害。对于这种情形,我国既有的法律规范主要以更正登记进行救济,但问题是,更正登记有着严格的程序,在短时间内无法完成,这会导致更正登记实际上不能发挥保护真实权利人的作用,使其形同虚设。为了消除这个隐患,法律就有必要设立异议登记制度,作为一种临时保护真正权利人的措施。登记制度担负着公法和私法上的双重功能。登记机关的登记行为是一种准行政行为,对登记行为的性质进行科学界定,是登记错误时救济模式选择的法律基础。设立异议登记制度有其合理性和必要性。外国异议登记制度特别是德国立法中的异议登记制度的相关规定对我国设立科学的异议登记制度具有重要的借鉴作用。我国虽然设立了异议登记制度,但是存在诸多缺陷,在登记错误的救济模式选择、发生原因的界定、发生程序的确定、异议登记的效力界定以及异议登记失效情形确定、登记机关的赔偿责任的确定等六个方面应予完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 In today’s frequent economic exchanges and circulations, For a variety of reasons, the inconsistent situation will inevitably occurs between the right in registration and the true right, that is wrong registration. In the property law which taken public reliance as its principle, Based on the credibility of registration, the people who have Registration records will be presumed to the real one in legal. If the facts have proved that the property right in registration do not exist or do exist flaws, to the people who trusts the property right exist and already has taken the property right transactions, the law still recognizes it has the same legal effect to the real property right. The people who have true right suffers the hurt. For such cases, the true obligee protecting can finally only be realized through the correction registration. But the question is, the correction registration has strict procedures, could not be completed in a short time, it leads to the correction registration could not play the role of protecting the people who has the true right, only exists in name. In order to eliminate this hidden danger, it is necessary to set up the dissenting registration system, as a temporary protection to the people who has the true right.Registration system have double function for public and private. Registration is a quasi-administrative action, Whether the definition of the nature of registration is scientific or not is the basis of mode selections when the registration is wrong. The establishment of the dissenting registration is inevitable, and reasonable. The dissenting registration in Foreign law, particularly, in German Civil law, have a reference to the improvement of dissenting registration in China. Although China established the dissenting registration, but there are many defects. We should perfect it in six facts: the mode selection of the wrong registration, dissenting registration’s causes, conditions, legal effect, and the problem of damages resulted from the invalidation or wrongness in the registration.更多还原